4.6 Article

Assessment of cytology and mucin 2 in colorectal mucus collected from patients with inflammatory bowel disease: Results of a pilot trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY
Volume 31, Issue 2, Pages 326-333

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13083

Keywords

colorectal mucus; cytology; diagnosis; IBD; mucin 2

Funding

  1. Innovate UK (UK Technology Strategy Board) [ref 710412]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background and AimNon-invasive diagnosis of colorectal disease remains problematic, fecal biomarkers presenting the only current option. Colorectal mucus is the diagnostically informative element of stool samples, but its separation from stool is difficult. We aimed to: (i) test a novel method of non-invasive colorectal mucus sampling in a pilot clinical trial; (ii) evaluate sampling method acceptance by study participants; (iii) characterize the collected material cytologically; and (iv) assess feasibility of quantitative protein analysis in the samples. MethodsA total of 141 patients with IBD (58), IBS (50), and healthy controls (33) participated in the study. Samples rich in colorectal mucus were self-collected by swabbing the anal area immediately following defecation. Collected samples were examined cytologically and subjected to quantitative analysis for total protein and mucin 2 (MUC2). ResultsThe novel sampling technique was assessed as good or adequate by 96% of study participants. A total of 55% of the collected samples were free of fecal contamination. Cytology showed large numbers of well preserved inflammatory cells in IBD cases. Total protein values varied in all groups, being affected by fecal contamination. MUC2 levels were similar among all IBD-free individuals (control and IBS groups) and elevated in IBD patients (p<0.001). MUC2 measurement applied as a test for IBD detection provided sensitivity=72.4% and specificity=86.7%. ConclusionsA novel non-invasive method for collecting human colorectal mucus has been successfully tested. The method was very well accepted by trial participants. The results have proven high quality of collected samples for both cytological investigation and diagnostic biomarker analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available