4.7 Article

Do geopolitical events transmit opportunity or threat to green markets? Decomposed measures of geopolitical risks

Journal

ENERGY ECONOMICS
Volume 111, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106068

Keywords

Green equity; Green bonds; Geopolitical risks; Cross-quantilogram

Categories

Funding

  1. Russian Science foundation, RSF [19-18-00262]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study finds that geopolitical risks have different impacts on the green equity and green bond markets. In bullish market states, measures of geopolitical risks have a negative effect on the volatility of the green market, while in bearish market states, measures of geopolitical risks have a positive effect on the volatility of the green market.
The growth of clean energies and technologies requires a sound financial market, while equity and bond markets are exposed to geopolitical risks. We investigate the response of green equity and green bonds to newly develop decomposed measures of geopolitical risks, including geopolitical acts, threats, and narrow and broad measures. To this end, we apply two robust methods; namely, the cross-quantilogram and quantile and quantile (QQ) approaches, to estimate the conditional and unconditional volatility spillovers considering short, medium, and long term. Surprisingly our empirical investigation demonstrates that all measures of geopolitical risk (except geopolitical acts) transmit positive shocks to the green investments (both equity and bonds) from bearish to bullish market states. At the bullish state, green markets respond negatively to the highest quantiles of all measures of geopolitical risks under a long memory. However, the geopolitical acts negatively shock the green bonds and green equity at some extreme quantiles. Our empirical findings are beneficial by transmitting opportunities and preventing risks for investment decision-making in the green markets, considering geopolitical risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available