A survey on how preregistration affects the research workflow: better science but more work

Prevalence of questionable research practices, research misconduct and their potential explanatory factors: A survey among academic researchers in The Netherlands

(2022) Gowri Gopalakrishna et al.   PLoS One

Documenting contributions to scholarly articles using CRediT and tenzing

(2021) Alex O. Holcombe et al.   PLoS One

Seven steps toward more transparency in statistical practice

(2021) Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.   Nature Human Behaviour

The effect of preregistration on trust in empirical research findings: results of a registered report

(2020) Sarahanne M. Field et al.   Royal Society Open Science

Preregistering qualitative research

(2019) Tamarinde L. Haven et al.   Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance

Flexible yet fair: blinding analyses in experimental psychology

(2019) Gilles Dutilh et al.   SYNTHESE

Preregistration Is Hard, And Worthwhile

(2019) Brian A. Nosek et al.   TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES

Is Preregistration Worthwhile?

(2019) Aba Szollosi et al.   TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES

A consensus-based transparency checklist

(2019) Balazs Aczel et al.   Nature Human Behaviour

Badges to Acknowledge Open Practices: A Simple, Low-Cost, Effective Method for Increasing Transparency

(2016) Mallory C. Kidwell et al.   PLOS BIOLOGY

Crowdsourced research: Many hands make tight work

(2015) Raphael Silberzahn et al.   NATURE

Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth

(2015) Robert MacCoun et al.   NATURE

Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex

(2012) Christopher D. Chambers   CORTEX