- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Flexible yet fair: blinding analyses in experimental psychology
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
SYNTHESE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2019-11-19
DOI
10.1007/s11229-019-02456-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Open science challenges, benefits and tips in early career and beyond
- (2019) Christopher Allen et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Scanning the horizon: towards transparent and reproducible neuroimaging research
- (2017) Russell A. Poldrack et al. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE
- Results from a Search for Dark Matter in the Complete LUX Exposure
- (2017) D. S. Akerib et al. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS
- Replication Study: BET bromodomain inhibition as a therapeutic strategy to target c-Myc
- (2017) Fraser Aird et al. eLife
- Replication Study: Melanoma genome sequencing reveals frequent PREX2 mutations
- (2017) Stephen K Horrigan et al. eLife
- A Bayesian bird's eye view of ‘Replications of important results in social psychology’
- (2017) Maarten Marsman et al. Royal Society Open Science
- A Bayesian Perspective on the Reproducibility Project: Psychology
- (2016) Alexander Etz et al. PLoS One
- Blind analysis: Hide results to seek the truth
- (2015) Robert MacCoun et al. NATURE
- Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science
- (2015) SCIENCE
- Promoting an open research culture
- (2015) B. A. Nosek et al. SCIENCE
- Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording
- (2015) Luke Holman et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
- (2015) Megan L. Head et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Ten reasons why journals must review manuscripts before results are known
- (2014) Christopher D. Chambers ADDICTION
- The Statistical Crisis in Science
- (2014) Andrew Gelman et al. AMERICAN SCIENTIST
- Observer bias in randomized clinical trials with time-to-event outcomes: systematic review of trials with both blinded and non-blinded outcome assessors
- (2014) Asbjørn Hróbjartsson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Lack of blinding of outcome assessors in animal model experiments implies risk of observer bias
- (2014) Segun Bello et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of Electroencephalographic (EEG) Neurofeedback in Children With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
- (2013) Martine van Dongen-Boomsma et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY
- Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon
- (2013) David R. Shanks et al. PLoS One
- Two Failures to Replicate High-Performance-Goal Priming Effects
- (2013) Christine R. Harris et al. PLoS One
- Registered Reports: A new publishing initiative at Cortex
- (2012) Christopher D. Chambers CORTEX
- The blind leading the blind: Use and misuse of blinding in randomized controlled trials
- (2010) Larry E. Miller et al. Contemporary Clinical Trials
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Striatum and pre-SMA facilitate decision-making under time pressure
- (2008) B. U. Forstmann et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now