Intervention is a better predictor of tDCS mind-wandering effects than subjective beliefs about experimental results
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Intervention is a better predictor of tDCS mind-wandering effects than subjective beliefs about experimental results
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Scientific Reports
Volume 12, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-07-30
DOI
10.1038/s41598-022-16545-0
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Letter to the editor: How some brain stimulation studies fail to evaluate blinding adequately
- (2021) Luisa Fassi et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- Efficacy and acceptability of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
- (2021) Ruibin Zhang et al. NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS
- The Role of Expectation and Beliefs on the Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation
- (2021) Miriam Braga et al. Brain Sciences
- Dissociable effects of tDCS polarity on latent decision processes are associated with individual differences in neurochemical concentrations and cortical morphology
- (2020) Hannah L. Filmer et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- Is the “end‐of‐study guess” a valid measure of sham blinding during transcranial direct current stimulation?
- (2020) Christopher Turner et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- tACS entrains neural activity while somatosensory input is blocked
- (2020) Pedro G. Vieira et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Bifrontal high-frequency transcranial random noise stimulation is not effective as an add-on treatment in depression
- (2020) Martin Schecklmann et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH
- Stimulating task unrelated thoughts: tDCS of prefrontal and parietal cortices leads to polarity specific increases in mind wandering
- (2020) Hannah L. Filmer et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- Sham tDCS: A hidden source of variability? Reflections for further blinded, controlled trials
- (2019) Clara Fonteneau et al. Brain Stimulation
- Oversight of direct-to-consumer neurotechnologies
- (2019) Anna Wexler et al. SCIENCE
- Blinding is compromised for transcranial direct current stimulation at 1 mA for 20 minutes in young healthy adults
- (2019) Zsolt Turi et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- The time course of ineffective sham‐blinding during low‐intensity (1 mA) transcranial direct current stimulation
- (2019) Robert Greinacher et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
- For a minute there, I lost myself … dosage dependent increases in mind wandering via prefrontal tDCS
- (2019) Hannah L. Filmer et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- Modulating brain activity and behaviour with tDCS: Rumours of its death have been greatly exaggerated
- (2019) Hannah L. Filmer et al. CORTEX
- Using tDCS to facilitate motor learning in speech production: The role of timing
- (2018) Adam Buchwald et al. CORTEX
- Improvements in Attention and Decision-Making Following Combined Behavioral Training and Brain Stimulation
- (2016) Hannah L. Filmer et al. CEREBRAL CORTEX
- The Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Multitasking Throughput Capacity
- (2016) Justin Nelson et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Development and Validation of a Miniature Programmable tDCS Device
- (2016) Abbas Z. Kouzani et al. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING
- Unilateral and bilateral MRI-targeted repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for treatment-resistant depression: a randomized controlled study
- (2016) Daniel M. Blumberger et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY & NEUROSCIENCE
- The effects of tDCS upon sustained visual attention are dependent on cognitive load
- (2016) James M. Roe et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults
- (2016) Denise Wallace et al. PLoS One
- Modulation of attention functions by anodal tDCS on right PPC
- (2015) Lucia B. Roy et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- “Unfocus” on foc.us: commercial tDCS headset impairs working memory
- (2015) Laura Steenbergen et al. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
- Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms
- (2014) Virginia López-Alonso et al. Brain Stimulation
- Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Motor Cortex
- (2014) Sarah Wiethoff et al. Brain Stimulation
- Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function
- (2014) Hannah L. Filmer et al. TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES
- Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS)
- (2013) Andrea Antal et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Testing the limits: Investigating the effect of tDCS dose on working memory enhancement in healthy controls
- (2013) Kate E. Hoy et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- The fade-in – Short stimulation – Fade out approach to sham tDCS – Reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators
- (2012) Géza Gergely Ambrus et al. Brain Stimulation
- Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation
- (2011) Sudha Kilaru Kessler et al. Brain Stimulation
- Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning
- (2011) C.J. Stagg et al. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA
- tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: a meta-analytical review
- (2011) Liron Jacobson et al. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH
- Reducing procedural pain and discomfort associated with transcranial direct current stimulation
- (2010) James L. McFadden et al. Brain Stimulation
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started