4.7 Article

Fungal digestive enzymes promote macronutrient hydrolysis in the INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of digestion

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 386, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132777

Keywords

Digestion; Enzyme; Protease; Lipase; Amylase; INFOGEST

Funding

  1. BIO-CAT, Inc. (Troy, VA, USA).

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to test the hydrolytic efficacy of 6 fungal enzymes in the INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal (GI) digestion. The study found that these enzymes improved the hydrolysis of dietary protein, lipid, and carbohydrate under simulated gastric or GI conditions, and the combination of these enzymes enhanced macronutrient digestion. The study also validated the efficacy of these enzymes in compromised digestive conditions.
The objective of this study was to test the hydrolytic efficacy of 6 fungal enzymes in the INFOGEST static in vitro simulation of gastrointestinal (GI) digestion. First, the INFOGEST protocol was adapted for testing of exogenous enzymes. Second, a dose-response study of 3 individual fungal proteases, a lipase, and an amylase with glucoamylase demonstrated improved dietary protein, lipid, and carbohydrate hydrolysis, respectively, from an oral nutritional supplement (ONS) under simulated gastric or GI conditions, compared to pepsin and pancreatinbased control conditions. Third, a combination of the 6 enzymes (BC-006) improved macronutrient digestion, including enhanced release of individual amino acids from ONS and mixed meal substrates. Finally, we validated digestive models of aging and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, and showed that BC-006 improved gastric digestion under these compromised digestive conditions. The INFOGEST static simulation is a feasible tool to rapidly screen and profile exogenous enzymes for digestive efficacy in vitro.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available