An inter-method comparison of four Human Reliability Assessment models
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
An inter-method comparison of four Human Reliability Assessment models
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 103750
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2022-04-06
DOI
10.1016/j.apergo.2022.103750
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Determining the source of human-system errors in manual order picking with respect to human factors
- (2021) Azin Setayesh et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
- Flight safety assessment based on an integrated human reliability quantification approach
- (2020) Yundong Guo et al. PLoS One
- A dynamic human reliability assessment approach for manned submersibles using PMV-CREAM
- (2019) Shuai Zhang et al. International Journal of Naval Architecture and Ocean Engineering
- Performer selection in Human Reliability analysis: D numbers approach
- (2019) Jie Zhao et al. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control
- Treatment of human and organizational factors for multi-unit HRA: Application of SPAR-H method
- (2019) Jooyoung Park et al. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
- An advanced human error assessment approach: HEART and AV‐DEMATEL
- (2019) Gülin F. Can et al. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
- Examining the fatigue-quality relationship in manufacturing
- (2019) Marcus Yung et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- Production quality and human factors engineering: A systematic review and theoretical framework
- (2018) Ahmet Kolus et al. APPLIED ERGONOMICS
- On the application of Human Reliability Analysis in healthcare: Opportunities and challenges
- (2018) Mark A. Sujan et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- A fuzzy and Bayesian network CREAM model for human reliability analysis – The case of tanker shipping
- (2018) Qingji Zhou et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- An integrated human reliability based decision pool generating and decision making method for power supply system in LNG terminal
- (2018) Renyou Zhang et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- A task-based fuzzy integrated MCDM approach for shopping mall selection considering universal design criteria
- (2018) Gülin Feryal Can et al. SOFT COMPUTING
- Early-design improvement of human reliability in an experimental facility: A combined approach and application on SPES
- (2018) M. Giardina et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- A validation research on fuzzy logic-AHP-based assessment method of operator’s situation awareness reliability
- (2018) Pengcheng Li et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- A new hybrid approach to human error probability quantification–applications in maritime operations
- (2017) Y.T. Xi et al. OCEAN ENGINEERING
- A review of multi criteria decision making (MCDM) towards sustainable renewable energy development
- (2017) Abhishek Kumar et al. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
- Applying Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to choose a human factors technique: Choosing the suitable Human Reliability Analysis technique for the automotive industry
- (2017) Alberto Petruni et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Incorporating CREAM and MCS into fault tree analysis of LNG carrier spill accidents
- (2017) Tuqiang Zhou et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Calculation and updating of Common Cause Failure unavailability by using alpha factor model
- (2016) Muhammad Zubair et al. ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY
- Suggested improvements to the definitions of Standardized Plant Analysis of Risk-Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) performance shaping factors, their levels and multipliers and the nominal tasks
- (2016) Karin Laumann et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- Human reliability analysis of the Tokai-Mura accident through a THERP–CREAM and expert opinion auditing approach
- (2016) A.C. Ribeiro et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Combined Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Therapy and One-Way Endobronchial Valve Placement in Patients with Pulmonary Emphysema: A Phase I Clinical Trial
- (2016) Hugo Goulart de Oliveira et al. Stem Cells Translational Medicine
- THERP and HEART integrated methodology for human error assessment
- (2015) Francesco Castiglia et al. RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY
- A Simulator for Human Error Probability Analysis (SHERPA)
- (2015) Valentina Di Pasquale et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- Bayesian belief networks for human reliability analysis: A review of applications and gaps
- (2015) L. Mkrtchyan et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- Human Error Data Collection and Comparison with Predictions by SPAR-H
- (2014) Peng Liu et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- Ergonomics action research II: a framework for integrating HF into work system design
- (2012) W.P. Neumann et al. ERGONOMICS
- A data-informed PIF hierarchy for model-based Human Reliability Analysis
- (2012) Katrina M. Groth et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- Estimating Human Error Probability using a modified CREAM
- (2012) Zhiqiang Sun et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
- A fuzzy Bayesian network approach to improve the quantification of organizational influences in HRA frameworks
- (2012) Peng-cheng Li et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work
- (2011) Esa-Pekka Takala et al. SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH
- Incident tree model and incident tree analysis method for quantified risk assessment: An in-depth accident study in traffic operation
- (2010) Wuhong Wang et al. SAFETY SCIENCE
- Fuzzy modelling of HEART methodology: application in safety analyses of accidental exposure in irradiation plants
- (2009) M. Casamirra et al. Radiation Effects and Defects in Solids
- A simplified CREAM prospective quantification process and its application
- (2007) Xuhong He et al. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started