4.7 Article

A comprehensive evaluation of physical and environmental performances for wet-white leather manufacture

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 139, Issue -, Pages 1512-1519

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.08.120

Keywords

Wet-white leather; Tannic acid; Laponite nanoclay; Combination tannage; Life cycle assessment

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation (NNSF) of China [21176159, 21476148]
  2. National High-tech Research and Development Program (863 program) of China [2013AA06A306]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The paper presents the comprehensive evaluation results of physical and environmental performances for a novel wet-white (chrome-free) leather manufacturing. The tanning process is optimized as 15 weg tannic acid (TA) combination with 4 wt% Laponite nanoclay, giving the leather with shrinkage temperature (Ts) above 86 degrees C. Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES) measurements indicate that Laponite can be evenly and tightly bound within the leather matrix, which is further confirmed by scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) spectroscopy analysis. The resultant wet-white leathers have reasonable good physical properties that can meet the standard requirements for furniture leather without containing hazardous Cr(VI) and formaldehyde. Further life cycle assessment (LCA) studies shows that tanning process is the main contributor to environmental impact categories in the wet-white tanning process, and tannic acid is the most significant substance factor. Compared to conventional chrome tanning, the wet-white tanning process exhibits much lower abiotic depletion potential (ADP), and reduced global warming potential (GWP) and human toxicity potential (HTP) impacts due to the nature of vegetable tanning: whereas, GWP excluding biogenic carbon and energy consumption are higher owing to prolonged run time. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available