4.7 Article

Response of complex networks to compression: Ca, La, and Y aluminoborosilicate glasses formed from liquids at 1 to 3 GPa pressures

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 144, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4940691

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NSF [EAR-1019596]
  2. Division Of Materials Research
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1400625] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aluminoborosilicate glasses containing relatively high field strength modifiers (Ca, La, and Y) have been compressed at pressures up to 3 GPa and near the glass transition temperature (T-g) and quenched to room temperature at high pressure followed by decompression. Structural changes were quantified with high-resolution Al-27 and B-11 MAS nuclear magnetic resonance at 14.1-18.8 T. The changes with pressure in Al and B coordinations in the recovered samples are quite large with more than 50% decreases in tetrahedral aluminum (Al-IV) and 200%-300% increases in tetrahedral boron (B-IV). Glasses with higher field strength modifiers (La and Y) contain more high coordinated aluminum (Al-V,Al-VI) at all pressures studied. More high coordinated boron also correlates with higher field strength modifier if all three compositions are compared on an isothermal basis. Although lowering fictive temperature and increasing pressure both increase Al and B coordinations, our study shows that the actual mechanisms for structural changes are most probably different for temperature and pressure effects. Using a rough thermodynamic model to extrapolate to higher pressures, it appears that a simple non-bridging oxygen (NBO) consumption mechanism is not sufficient to convert all the aluminum to octahedral and boron to tetrahedral coordination, suggesting other mechanisms for structural changes could occur at high pressure as NBO becomes depleted. (C) 2016 AIP Publishing LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available