Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Faculty appointment and promotion in Taiwan’s medical schools, a systematic analysis
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
BMC Medical Education
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-05-10
DOI
10.1186/s12909-022-03435-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Response to COVID-19 in Taiwan
- (2020) C. Jason Wang et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Academic criteria for promotion and tenure in biomedical sciences faculties: cross sectional analysis of international sample of universities
- (2020) Danielle B Rice et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Citation inequality and the Journal Impact Factor: median, mean, (does it) matter?
- (2020) Tobias Kiesslich et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- How significant are the public dimensions of faculty work in review, promotion and tenure documents?
- (2019) Juan P Alperin et al. eLife
- Use of the Journal Impact Factor in academic review, promotion, and tenure evaluations
- (2019) Erin C McKiernan et al. eLife
- Retraction
- (2018) FASEB JOURNAL
- Prestigious Science Journals Struggle to Reach Even Average Reliability
- (2018) Björn Brembs Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure
- (2018) David Moher et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Retraction Note to: Retraction: G9a/RelB regulates self-renewal and function of colon-cancer-initiating cells by silencing Let-7b and activating the K-RAS/β-catenin pathway
- (2017) Shih-Ting Cha et al. NATURE CELL BIOLOGY
- Empirical assessment of published effect sizes and power in the recent cognitive neuroscience and psychology literature
- (2017) Denes Szucs et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- Publish or impoverish
- (2017) Wei Quan et al. Aslib Journal of Information Management
- Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen's work on journal impact and research evaluation
- (2017) Lin Zhang et al. PLoS One
- Retraction: Hyperbaric oxygen activates discoidin domain receptor 2 via tumour necrosis factor- and the p38 MAPK pathway to increase vascular smooth muscle cell migration through matrix metalloproteinase 2
- (2016) K.-G. Shyu et al. CLINICAL SCIENCE
- Time to remodel the journal impact factor
- (2016) NATURE
- Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
- (2015) Diana Hicks et al. NATURE
- The Quality of the Evidence According to GRADE Is Predominantly Low or Very Low in Oral Health Systematic Reviews
- (2015) Nikolaos Pandis et al. PLoS One
- Causes for the Persistence of Impact Factor Mania
- (2014) A. Casadevall et al. mBio
- Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
- (2013) Laura E Chess et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
- (2013) Björn Brembs et al. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
- High Impact = High Statistical Standards? Not Necessarily So
- (2013) Patrizio E. Tressoldi et al. PLoS One
- Medical education in Taiwan
- (2012) Jen-Yu Chou et al. MEDICAL TEACHER
- Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
- (2012) F. C. Fang et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Retracted Science and the Retraction Index
- (2011) Ferric C. Fang et al. INFECTION AND IMMUNITY
- Retractions in the scientific literature: do authors deliberately commit research fraud?
- (2010) R. G. Steen JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Empirical series of journal h-indices: The JCR category Horticulture as a case study
- (2009) Yuxian Liu et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started