Success and failure factors of patient recruitment for industry-sponsored clinical trials and the role of the electronic health records—a qualitative interview study in the Nordic countries
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Success and failure factors of patient recruitment for industry-sponsored clinical trials and the role of the electronic health records—a qualitative interview study in the Nordic countries
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
Trials
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2022-05-12
DOI
10.1186/s13063-022-06144-9
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Reporting Transparency and Completeness in Trials: Paper 4 - Reporting of randomised controlled trials conducted using routinely collected electronic records – room for improvement
- (2021) Stephen J. McCall et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Benchmarking Patient Recruitment and Retention Practices
- (2020) Mary Jo Lamberti et al. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science
- Challenges to and Facilitators of Recruitment to an Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Trial: A Qualitative Interview Study
- (2019) Clare Clement et al. JOURNAL OF ALZHEIMERS DISEASE
- The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners
- (2019) Paul A. Harris et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study
- (2019) Matthias Briel et al. Trials
- Understanding and Improving Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Qualitative Research Approaches
- (2017) Daisy Elliott et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Recruitment failure and futility were the most common reasons for discontinuation of clinical drug trials. Results of a nationwide inception cohort study in the Netherlands
- (2017) Cornelis A. van den Bogert et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Feasibility of extracting data from electronic medical records for research: an international comparative study
- (2016) Michelle Helena van Velthoven et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Distinguishing Features and Similarities Between Descriptive Phenomenological and Qualitative Description Research
- (2016) Danny G. Willis et al. WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH
- Unsuccessful trial accrual and human subjects protections: An empirical analysis of recently closed trials
- (2014) Benjamin Carlisle et al. Clinical Trials
- Review of 103 Swedish Healthcare Quality Registries
- (2014) L. Emilsson et al. JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Strategies to Support Recruitment of Patients With Life-Limiting Illness for Research: The Palliative Care Research Cooperative Group
- (2014) Laura C. Hanson et al. JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
- Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2013) Shaun Treweek et al. BMJ Open
- A Sense of Urgency: Evaluating the Link between Clinical Trial Development Time and the Accrual Performance of Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (NCI-CTEP) Sponsored Studies
- (2010) S. K. Cheng et al. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH
- Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: A review of the research literature
- (2008) K HAYRINEN et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- The qualitative content analysis process
- (2008) Satu Elo et al. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
- (2008) Paul A. Harris et al. JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started