The inadequacies of pre-market chemical risk assessment's toxicity studies-the implications

Study sensitivity: Evaluating the ability to detect effects in systematic reviews of chemical exposures

(2016) Glinda S. Cooper et al.   ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL

The relationship between study sponsorship, risks of bias, and research outcomes in atrazine exposure studies conducted in non-human animals: Systematic review and meta-analysis

(2016) L. Bero et al.   ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL

Financial Conflicts of Interest and Study Results in Environmental and Occupational Health Research

(2016) Lee Friedman et al.   JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE

Food for thought … on evidence-based toxicology

(2016) Thomas Hartung   ALTEX-Alternatives to Animal Experimentation

Assessing dose–response relationships for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): a focus on non-monotonicity

(2015) R Thomas Zoeller et al.   Environmental Health

Spatial and temporal trends of the Stockholm Convention POPs in mothers’ milk — a global review

(2015) Johan Fång et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH

Europe's food watchdog embraces transparency

(2015) T. Rabesandratana   SCIENCE

Research Data in Core Journals in Biology, Chemistry, Mathematics, and Physics

(2015) Ryan P. Womack   PLoS One

Risk assessment׳s insensitive toxicity testing may cause it to fail

(2014) Vito A. Buonsante et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH

Open letter to the European commission: scientifically unfounded precaution drives European commission’s recommendations on EDC regulation, while defying common sense, well-established science, and risk assessment principles

(2013) Daniel Dietrich et al.   ARCHIVES OF TOXICOLOGY

Policy Decisions on Endocrine Disruptors Should Be Based on Science Across Disciplines: A Response to Dietrichet al.

(2013) A. C. Gore et al.   ENDOCRINOLOGY

Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors

(2013) Åke Bergman et al.   Environmental Health

Implementing Systematic Review at the National Toxicology Program: Status and Next Steps

(2013) Linda S. Birnbaum et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

In Support of EHP ’s Proposal to Adopt the ARRIVE Guidelines

(2013) Hanna M. Vesterinen et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

Reporting of Results from Animal Studies

(2013) Hugh A. Tilson et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

15 Years Out: Reinventing ICCVAM

(2013) Linda S. Birnbaum   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals

(2013) Marlene Ågerstrand et al.   HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT

Effect of soil organic amendments on the behavior of bentazone and tricyclazole

(2013) M. García-Jaramillo et al.   SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT

The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing

(2013) Anna Beronius et al.   TOXICOLOGY

Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses

(2012) Laura N. Vandenberg et al.   ENDOCRINE REVIEWS

Designing endocrine disruption out of the next generation of chemicals

(2012) T. T. Schug et al.   GREEN CHEMISTRY

History of Chronic Toxicity and Animal Carcinogenicity Studies for Pharmaceuticals

(2012) A. C. Jacobs et al.   VETERINARY PATHOLOGY

Developmental origins of noncommunicable disease: population and public health implications

(2011) Mark Hanson et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION

A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants

(2011) José L. Domingo et al.   ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL

The Matthew effect in environmental science publication: A bibliometric analysis of chemical substances in journal articles

(2011) Philippe Grandjean et al.   Environmental Health

Environmental Exposures and Mammary Gland Development: State of the Science, Public Health Implications, and Research Recommendations

(2011) Ruthann A. Rudel et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

Consequences of Exposure to Carcinogens Beginning During Developmental Life

(2010) Morando Soffritti et al.   BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY

Current Assessment of the Effects of Environmental Chemicals on the Mammary Gland in Guideline Rodent Studies by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and National Toxicology Program (NTP)

(2010) Susan L. Makris   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

Association of financial or professional conflict of interest to research outcomes on health risks or nutritional assessment studies of genetically modified products

(2010) Johan Diels et al.   FOOD POLICY

Participation Of Academic Scientists In Relationships With Industry

(2009) Darren E. Zinner et al.   HEALTH AFFAIRS

The Limits of Two-Year Bioassay Exposure Regimens for Identifying Chemical Carcinogens

(2008) James Huff et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES

Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A

(2008) John Peterson Myers et al.   ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES