Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals

Title
Bad Reporting or Bad Science? Systematic Data Evaluation as a Means to Improve the Use of Peer-Reviewed Studies in Risk Assessments of Chemicals
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
Volume 20, Issue 6, Pages 1427-1445
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Online
2013-10-18
DOI
10.1080/10807039.2013.854139

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.

Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.

Explore

Become a Peeref-certified reviewer

The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.

Get Started