4.8 Review

Prognostics and health management of Lithium-ion battery using deep learning methods: A review

Journal

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS
Volume 161, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112282

Keywords

Prognostics and health management; Lithium-ion battery; Deep learning

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Founda-tion of China [71731008]
  2. Natural Science Founda-tion of Beijing Municipality, China [L191022]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper summarizes the applications of deep learning-based PHM of Li-ion battery, including data acquisition, deep learning methods, and performance evaluation. It also discusses the prospects of using deep learning techniques in the PHM of Li-ion battery.
Prognostics and health management (PHM) is developed to guarantee the safety and reliability of Lithium ion (Li-ion) battery during operations. Due to the advantages of deep learning on nonlinear modeling and representation learning, it gains considerable attentions in the PHM of Li-ion battery. To provide a comprehensive view of deep learning-based PHM of Li-ion battery, this paper summarizes these applications on the basis of current research. Deep learning-based PHM of Li-ion battery roughly involves three steps, namely data acquisition, deep learning methods and performance evaluation. Firstly, regular data types and public datasets are introduced. Secondly, brief introductions of deep learning methods and their applications to PHM of Li-ion battery are summarized. These deep learning methods include autoencoder, deep neural network, deep belief network, convolutional neural network, recurrent neural network and generative adversarial network. Thirdly, commonly-used evaluation metrics are presented. Finally, the paper draws a conclusion and presents the prospects of PHM of Li-ion battery with deep learning techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available