4.7 Article

The Interaction between Chondroitin Sulfate and Dermatan Sulfate Tetrasaccharides and Pleiotrophin

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063026

Keywords

carbohydrate-protein interaction; pleiotrophin; chondroitin sulfate; GAG synthesis; transient NMR methods; STD-NMR spectroscopy

Funding

  1. MINECO-MCIN/AEI [PGC2018-099497-B-100, CTQ2015-70134-P]
  2. FEDER EU
  3. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the interaction between synthetic models of CS types and mimetics with PTN was investigated using NMR techniques. The introduction of lipophilic substituents in the ligand structure was found to improve the binding strength of PTN, and the binding modes of PTN and MK were similar with multiple binding modes.
Pleiotrophin (PTN) is a neurotrophic factor that participates in the development of the embryonic central nervous system (CNS) and neural stem cell regulation by means of an interaction with sulfated glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Chondroitin sulfate (CS) is the natural ligand in the CNS. We have previously studied the complexes between the tetrasaccharides used here and MK (Midkine) by ligand-observed NMR techniques. The present work describes the interactions between a tetrasaccharide library of synthetic models of CS-types and mimetics thereof with PTN using the same NMR transient techniques. We have concluded that: (1) global ligand structures do not change upon binding, (2) the introduction of lipophilic substituents in the structure of the ligand improves the strength of binding, (3) binding is weaker than for MK, (4) STD-NMR results are compatible with multiple binding modes, and (5) the replacement of GlcA for IdoA is not relevant for binding. Then we can conclude that the binding of CS derivatives to PTN and MK are similar and compatible with multiple binding modes of the same basic conformation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available