4.2 Article

Prognostic and Functional Analysis of NPY6R in Uveal Melanoma Using Bioinformatics

Journal

DISEASE MARKERS
Volume 2022, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/4143447

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Neuropeptide Y receptor Y6 (NPY6R) is poorly expressed in uveal melanoma (UVM) and is associated with better prognosis. NPY6R expression is related to clinical features and immune microenvironment of UVM. NPY6R may be involved in tumor progression of UVM.
Neuropeptides can mediate tumor cell proliferation and differentiation through autocrine, paracrine, neurosecretory, and endocrine mechanisms. This study investigated the expression and prognostic significance of neuropeptide Y receptor Y6 (NPY6R) in uveal melanoma (UVM) and preliminarily investigated the biological function of NPY6R in UVM. NPY6R was poorly expressed in most tumors and was associated with better prognosis in UVM. Among the clinicopathological features of UVM, NPY6R expression was lower in male patients. The area under the curve (AUC) value of NPY6R for the diagnosis of UVM was 0.676 (95% CI: 0.556-0.795). A nomogram including four clinical predictors was constructed. NPY6R expression was significantly associated with features of the UVM immune microenvironment. ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms were used to calculate the fraction of immune cells and the percentage of infiltration in each patient, respectively. NPY6R expression-related gene ontology (GO), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG), and gene set enrichment analyses were performed. GO and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed that NPY6R-related genes are mainly enriched in pathways and functions related to visual light perception. Gene set enrichment analysis suggested that NPY6R is associated with tumor progression in UVM. NPY6R is involved in the tumor progression of UVM and has a good predictive value as a prognostic marker of UVM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available