Assessment of Alectinib vs Ceritinib in ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Phase 2 Trials and in Real-world Data
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Assessment of Alectinib vs Ceritinib in ALK-Positive Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer in Phase 2 Trials and in Real-world Data
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JAMA Network Open
Volume 4, Issue 10, Pages e2126306
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Online
2021-10-11
DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26306
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A retrospective study of alectinib versus ceritinib in patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer of anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion in whom crizotinib treatment failed
- (2021) Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo et al. BMC CANCER
- Propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting to address confounding by indication in comparative effectiveness research of oral anticoagulants
- (2020) Victoria Allan et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Synthetic and External Controls in Clinical Trials – A Primer for Researchers
- (2020) Kristian Thorlund et al. Clinical Epidemiology
- Real-world evidence and nonrandomized data in health technology assessment: use existing methods to address unmeasured confounding?
- (2020) Cormac J Sammon et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Evolving use of real-world evidence in the regulatory process: a focus on immuno-oncology treatment and outcomes
- (2020) John C O’Donnell et al. Future Oncology
- Single-arm Trials With External Comparators and Confounder Misclassification
- (2020) Michael Webster-Clark et al. MEDICAL CARE
- How to Deal with the Inevitable: Generating Real-World Data and Using Real-World Evidence for HTA Purposes – From Theory to Action
- (2019) Wija Oortwijn et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Real-World Evidence: Useful in the Real World of US Payer Decision Making? How? When? And What Studies?
- (2018) Daniel C. Malone et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Comparative effectiveness from a single-arm trial and real-world data: alectinib versus ceritinib
- (2018) Jessica Davies et al. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
- Longitudinal study to assess impact of smoking at diagnosis and quitting on 1-year survival for people with non-small cell lung cancer
- (2018) Rachel E. Gemine et al. LUNG CANCER
- Real-world data for efficient health technology assessment
- (2017) Peter S. Hall EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Quantitative Bias Analysis in Regulatory Settings
- (2016) Timothy L. Lash et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH
- Alectinib in Crizotinib-Refractory ALK-Rearranged Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Global Study
- (2016) Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Alectinib in ALK -positive, crizotinib-resistant, non-small-cell lung cancer: a single-group, multicentre, phase 2 trial
- (2016) Alice T Shaw et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Racial and Ethnic Differences in the Epidemiology and Genomics of Lung Cancer
- (2016) Matthew B. Schabath et al. Cancer Control
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreCreate your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create Now