4.7 Article

Brassinosteroid Biosynthetic Gene SlCYP90B3 Alleviates Chilling Injury of Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) Fruits during Cold Storage

Journal

ANTIOXIDANTS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11010115

Keywords

tomato fruit; cold storage; antioxidant enzymes; membranous lipolytic enzymes; SlCBF1

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31830078, 32002024]
  2. fund of Hangzhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences [2019HNCT-05]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University [2020QNA6023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that low temperature promotes the expression of brassinosteroid biosynthetic genes in tomato fruits, and overexpression of these genes can alleviate chilling injury by regulating the antioxidant enzyme system and SlCBF1 gene expression.
Tomato is susceptible to chilling injury during cold storage. In this study, we found that low temperature promoted the expression of brassinosteroid (BR) biosynthetic genes in tomato fruits. The overexpression of SlCYP90B3 (SlCYP90B3-OE), a key BR biosynthetic gene, alleviated the chilling injury with decreased electrical conductivity and malondialdehyde. In SlCYP90B3-OE tomato fruits, the activities of antioxidant enzymes, including ascorbate peroxidase (APX), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD), were markedly increased, while the activity of membranous lipolytic enzymes, lipoxygenase (LOX), and phospholipase D (PLD), were significantly decreased when compared with the wild-type in response to cold storage. Furthermore, the expression level of the cold-response-system component, SlCBF1, was higher in SlCYP90B3-OE fruits than in the wild-type fruits. These results indicated that SlCYP90B3 might be involved in the chilling tolerance of tomato fruits during cold storage, possibly by regulating the antioxidant enzyme system and SlCBF1 expression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available