4.7 Article

Differential Antibody Response to Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccines in Healthy Subjects

Journal

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.791660

Keywords

antibody response; inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine; neutralizing antibody; antibody dynamic; immune response

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Project of Foshan Municipality [2020001000431]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program [2021YFC0863300]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A study showed that 90.7% of vaccinated individuals had NAb seroconversion, with all participants who seroconverted after the first dose being females with relatively high prevaccine estradiol levels. Individuals without seroconversion tended to have lower lymphocyte counts and higher serum SAA levels. Additionally, young vaccine recipients had significantly higher peak NAb titers compared to elderly recipients.
The appearance and magnitude of the immune response and the related factors correlated with SARS-CoV-2 vaccination need to be defined. Here, we enrolled a prospective cohort of 52 participants who received two doses of inactivated vaccines (BBIBP-CorV). Their serial plasma samples (n = 260) over 2 months were collected at five timepoints. We measured antibody responses (NAb, S-IgG and S-IgM) and routine blood parameter. NAb seroconversion occurred in 90.7% of vaccinated individuals and four typical NAb kinetic curves were observed. All of the participants who seroconverted after the first dose were females and had relatively high prevaccine estradiol levels. Moreover, those without seroconversion tended to have lower lymphocyte counts and higher serum SAA levels than those who experienced seroconversion. The NAb titers in young vaccine recipients had a significantly higher peak than those in elderly recipients. S-IgG and S-IgM dynamics were accompanied by similar trends in NAb. Here, we gained insight into the dynamic changes in NAbs and preliminarily explored the prevaccine blood parameters related to the kinetic subclasses, providing a reference for vaccination strategies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available