4.5 Article

Pervasive Neglect of Sex Differences in Biomedical Research

Journal

Publisher

COLD SPRING HARBOR LAB PRESS, PUBLICATIONS DEPT
DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a039156

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [R15MH113085, AI-67406]
  2. Institute for Mind and Biology
  3. Social Sciences Division of the University of Chicago

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Females have long been underrepresented in preclinical research and clinical drug trials. Although there has been progress in increasing female participation, further steps such as sex-based analysis and sex-specific drug dosing remain to be implemented.
Females have long been underrepresented in preclinical research and clinical drug trials. Directives by the U.S. National Institutes of Health have increased female participation in research protocols, although analysis of outcomes by sex remains infrequent. The long-held view that traits of female rats and mice are more variable than those of males is discredited, supporting equal representation of both sexes in most studies. Drug pharmacokinetic analysis reveals that, among subjects administered a standard drug dose, women are exposed to higher blood drug concentrations and longer drug elimination times. This contributes to increased adverse drug reactions in women and suggests that women are routinely overmedicated and should be administered lower drug doses than men. The past decade has seen progress in female inclusion, but key subsequent steps such as sex-based analysis and sex-specific drug dosing remain to be implemented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available