4.4 Article

Modeling Faking in the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format: The Faking Mixture Model

Journal

PSYCHOMETRIKA
Volume 87, Issue 2, Pages 773-794

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11336-021-09818-6

Keywords

multidimensional forced-choice; faking; item response theory; mixture model

Funding

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [2277]
  2. state of Baden-Wurttemberg through bwHPC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study introduces a mixture item response theory model to estimate faking risk in the multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format. Simulation and empirical validation results indicate that matching is necessary to reduce faking risk, but not sufficient to completely eliminate it.
The multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed to reduce faking because items within blocks can be matched on desirability. However, the desirability of individual items might not transfer to the item blocks. The aim of this paper is to propose a mixture item response theory model for faking in the MFC format that allows to estimate the fakability of MFC blocks, termed the Faking Mixture model. Given current computing capabilities, within-subject data from both high- and low-stakes contexts are needed to estimate the model. A simulation showed good parameter recovery under various conditions. An empirical validation showed that matching was necessary but not sufficient to create an MFC questionnaire that can reduce faking. The Faking Mixture model can be used to reduce fakability during test construction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Mathematics, Interdisciplinary Applications

Investigating the Normativity of Trait Estimates from Multidimensional Forced-Choice Data

Susanne Frick, Anna Brown, Eunike Wetzel

Summary: The study evaluated the normativity of Thurstonian IRT trait estimates in multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) data through simulation and empirical analysis. The results showed that Thurstonian IRT trait estimates were normative in contrast to classical partially ipsative estimates. Factors such as unbalanced numbers of items per trait, few opposite keyed items, traits correlated positively or assessing fewer traits did not significantly decrease measurement precision. Measurement precision was lower than that of rating scale data. The study also found that relative MFC responses did not provide better differentiation of behaviors within persons compared to absolute TF responses.

MULTIVARIATE BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH (2023)

Article Religion

A many-analysts approach to the relation between religiosity and well-being

Suzanne Hoogeveen, Alexandra Sarafoglou, Balazs Aczel, Yonathan Aditya, Alexandra J. Alayan, Peter J. Allen, Sacha Altay, Shilaan Alzahawi, Yulmaida Amir, Francis-Vincent Anthony, Obed Kwame Appiah, Quentin D. Atkinson, Adam Baimel, Merve Balkaya-Ince, Michela Balsamo, Sachin Banker, Frantisek Bartos, Mario Becerra, Bertrand Beffara, Julia Beitner, Theiss Bendixen, Jana B. Berkessel, Renatas Berniunas, Matthew Billet, Joseph Billingsley, Tiago Bortolini, Heiko Breitsohl, Amelie Bret, Faith L. Brown, Jennifer Brown, Claudia C. Brumbaugh, Jacek Buczny, Joseph Bulbulia, Saul Caballero, Leonardo Carlucci, Cheryl L. Carmichael, Marco E. G. Cattaneo, Sarah J. Charles, Scott Claessens, Maxinne C. Panagopoulos, Angelo Brandelli Costa, Damien L. Crone, Stefan Czoschke, Christian Czymara, E. Damiano D'Urso, Orjan Dahlstrom, Anna Dalla Rosa, Henrik Danielsson, Jill De Ron, Ymkje Anna de Vries, Kristy K. Dean, Bryan J. Dik, David J. Disabato, Jaclyn K. Doherty, Tim Draws, Lucas Drouhot, Marin Dujmovic, Yarrow Dunham, Tobias Ebert, Peter A. Edelsbrunner, Anita Eerland, Christian T. Elbaek, Shole Farahmand, Hooman Farahmand, Miguel Farias, Abrey A. Feliccia, Kyle Fischer, Ronald Fischer, Donna Fisher-Thompson, Zoe Francis, Susanne Frick, Lisa K. Frisch, Diogo Geraldes, Emily Gerdin, Linda Geven, Omid Ghasemi, Erwin Gielens, Vukasin Gligoric, Kristin Hagel, Nandor Hajdu, Hannah R. Hamilton, Imaduddin Hamzah, Paul H. P. Hanel, Christopher E. Hawk, Karel K. Himawan, Benjamin C. Holding, Lina E. Homman, Moritz Ingendahl, Hilla Inkila, Mary L. Inman, Chris-Gabriel Islam, Ozan Isler, David Izydorczyk, Bastian Jaeger, Kathryn A. Johnson, Jonathan Jong, Johannes A. Karl, Erikson Kaszubowski, Benjamin A. Katz, Lucas A. Keefer, Stijn Kelchtermans, John M. Kelly, Richard A. Klein, Bennett Kleinberg, Megan L. Knowles, Marta Kolczynska, Dave Koller, Julia Krasko, Sarah Kritzler, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Thanos Kyritsis, Todd L. Landes, Ruben Laukenmann, Guy A. Lavender Forsyth, Aryeh Lazar, Barbara J. Lehman, Neil Levy, Ronda F. Lo, Paul Lodder, Jennifer Lorenz, Pawel Lowicki, Albert L. Ly, Esther Maassen, Gina M. Magyar-Russell, Maximilian Maier, Dylan R. Marsh, Nuria Martinez, Marcellin Martinie, Ihan Martoyo, Susan E. Mason, Anne Lundahl Mauritsen, Phil McAleer, Thomas McCauley, Michael McCullough, Ryan McKay, Camilla M. McMahon, Amelia A. McNamara, Kira K. Means, Brett Mercier, Panagiotis Mitkidis, Benoit Monin, Jordan W. Moon, David Moreau, Jonathan Morgan, James Murphy, George Muscatt, Christof Nagel, Tamas Nagy, Ladislas Nalborczyk, Gustav Nilsonne, Pamina Noack, Ara Norenzayan, Michele B. Nuijten, Anton Olsson-Collentine, Lluis Oviedo, Yuri G. Pavlov, James O. Pawelski, Hannah Pearson, Hugo Pedder, Hannah K. Peetz, Michael Pinus, Steven Pirutinsky, Vince Polito, Michaela Porubanova, Michael J. Poulin, Jason M. Prenoveau, Mark A. Prince, John Protzko, Campbell Pryor, Benjamin G. Purzycki, Lin Qiu, Julian Quevedo Putter, Andre Rabelo, Milen L. Radell, Jonathan E. Ramsay, Graham Reid, Andrew J. Roberts, Lindsey M. Root Luna, Robert M. Ross, Piotr Roszak, Nirmal Roy, Suvi-Maria K. Saarelainen, Joni Y. Sasaki, Catherine Schaumans, Bruno Schivinski, Marcel C. Schmitt, Sarah A. Schnitker, Martin Schnuerch, Marcel R. Schreiner, Victoria Schuttengruber, Simone Sebben, Suzanne C. Segerstrom, Berenika Seryczynska, Uffe Shjoedt, Muge Simsek, Willem W. A. Sleegers, Eliot R. Smith, Walter J. Sowden, Marion Spath, Christoph Sporlein, William Stedden, Andrea H. Stoevenbelt, Simon Stuber, Justin Sulik, Christiany Suwartono, Stylianos Syropoulos, Barnabas Szaszi, Peter Szecsi, Ben M. Tappin, Louis Tay, Robert T. Thibault, Burt Thompson, Christian M. Thurn, Josefa Torralba, Shelby D. Tuthill, Ann-Marie Ullein, Robbie C. M. Van Aert, Marcel A. L. M. van Assen, Patty Van Cappellen, Olmo R. van den Akker, Ine Van der Cruyssen, Jolanda Van der Noll, Noah N. N. van Dongen, Caspar J. Van Lissa, Valerie van Mulukom, Don van Ravenzwaaij, Casper J. J. van Zyl, Leigh Ann Vaughn, Bruno Verschuere, Michelangelo Vianello, Felipe Vilanova, Allon Vishkin, Vera Vogel, Leonie V. D. E. Vogelsmeier, Shoko Watanabe, Cindel J. M. White, Kristina Wiebels, Sera Wiechert, Zachary Z. Willett, Maciej Witkowiak, Charlotte V. O. Witvliet, Dylan Wiwad, Robin Wuyts, Dimitris Xygalatas, Xin Yang, Darren J. Yeo, Onurcan Yilmaz, Natalia Zarzeczna, Yitong Zhao, Josjan Zijlmans, Michiel van Elk, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers

Summary: The relation between religiosity and well-being was investigated using a new cross-cultural dataset, and the results showed that most teams reported a positive relationship, with religiosity being associated with higher levels of well-being. Additionally, the results indicated that the relation between religiosity and well-being varied depending on the cultural norms of religion.

RELIGION BRAIN & BEHAVIOR (2023)

Editorial Material Religion

Measurement issues in the many analysts religion project

Marcel R. Schreiner, Brett Mercier, Susanne Frick, Dylan Wiwad, Marcel C. Schmitt, John Michael Kelly, Julian Quevedo Puetter

RELIGION BRAIN & BEHAVIOR (2023)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Does Multidimensional Forced-Choice Prevent Faking? Comparing the Susceptibility of the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format and the Rating Scale Format to Faking

Eunike Wetzel, Susanne Frick, Anna Brown

Summary: This study compared the effectiveness of multidimensional forced-choice and rating scales in preventing faking, and found that multidimensional forced-choice was more effective in reducing faking. Additionally, faking effects could be further reduced by matching items with similar levels of social desirability.

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (2021)

Article Psychology, Clinical

Comparing the Validity of Trait Estimates From the Multidimensional Forced-Choice Format and the Rating Scale Format

Eunike Wetzel, Susanne Frick

PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT (2020)

No Data Available