Journal
NATURE REVIEWS NEUROLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 158-172Publisher
NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41582-021-00616-3
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research [MJFF-010349]
- Alzheimer Forschung Initiative e.V. [20059CB]
- Swiss National Research Foundation [320030_189140/1]
- US Department of Defense -TBI Endpoints Development Initiative [W81XWH-14-2-0176]
- TRACK-TBI Precision Medicine [W81XWH-18-2-0042]
- TRACK-TBI NETWORK [W81XWH-15-9-0001]
- NIH-NINDS TRACK-TBI [U01NS086090]
- NIH-NINDS -TRACK-TBI [U01NS086090]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [320030_189140] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Blood-derived biomarkers, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), hold promise in the diagnosis and prognosis of neurological diseases. However, there are limitations that hinder the widespread clinical use of GFAP as a biomarker.
Blood-derived biomarkers for brain and spinal cord diseases are urgently needed. The introduction of highly sensitive immunoassays led to a rapid increase in the number of potential blood-derived biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring of neurological disorders. In 2018, the FDA authorized a blood test for clinical use in the evaluation of mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). The test measures levels of the astrocytic intermediate filament glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and neuroaxonal marker ubiquitin carboxy-terminal hydrolase L1. In TBI, blood GFAP levels are correlated with clinical severity and extent of intracranial pathology. Evidence also indicates that blood GFAP levels hold the potential to reflect, and might enable prediction of, worsening of disability in individuals with progressive multiple sclerosis. A growing body of evidence suggests that blood GFAP levels can be used to detect even subtle injury to the CNS. Most importantly, the successful completion of the ongoing validation of point-of-care platforms for blood GFAP might ameliorate the decision algorithms for acute neurological diseases, such as TBI and stroke, with important economic implications. In this Review, we provide a systematic overview of the evidence regarding the utility of blood GFAP as a biomarker in neurological diseases. We propose a model for GFAP concentration dynamics in different conditions and discuss the limitations that hamper the widespread use of GFAP in the clinical setting. In our opinion, the clinical use of blood GFAP measurements has the potential to contribute to accelerated diagnosis and improved prognostication, and represents an important step forward in the era of precision medicine. In this Review, the authors provide an overview of the evidence regarding the use of blood levels of glial fibrillary acidic protein as a biomarker in a range of neurological diseases, including traumatic brain injury, stroke, multiple sclerosis and Alzheimer disease.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available