Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Enablers and barriers to implementing collaborative care for anxiety and depression: a systematic qualitative review
Authors
Keywords
Collaborative care, Shared care, Implementation, Enablers, Barriers, Anxiety, Depression, Qualitative review
Journal
Implementation Science
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-12-28
DOI
10.1186/s13012-016-0519-y
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Managing depression in people with multimorbidity: a qualitative evaluation of an integrated collaborative care model
- (2015) Sarah E Knowles et al. BMC Family Practice
- Contextualizing the Effectiveness of a Collaborative Care Model for Primary Care Patients with Diabetes and Depression (Teamcare): A Qualitative Assessment Using RE-AIM
- (2015) Lisa Wozniak et al. Canadian Journal of Diabetes
- Promoting professional behaviour change in healthcare: what interventions work, and why? A theory-led overview of systematic reviews
- (2015) Mark J Johnson et al. BMJ Open
- Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease
- (2015) P. Coventry et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Integrated primary care for patients with mental and physical multimorbidity: cluster randomised controlled trial of collaborative care for patients with depression comorbid with diabetes or cardiovascular disease
- (2015) P. Coventry et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Barriers to Advance Care Planning at the End of Life: An Explanatory Systematic Review of Implementation Studies
- (2015) Susi Lund et al. PLoS One
- Facilitating professional liaison in collaborative care for depression in UK primary care; a qualitative study utilising normalisation process theory
- (2014) Nia Coupe et al. BMC Family Practice
- Understanding the challenges to implementing case management for people with dementia in primary care in England: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory
- (2014) Claire Bamford et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Implementation of a self-management support approach (WISE) across a health system: a process evaluation explaining what did and did not work for organisations, clinicians and patients
- (2014) Anne Kennedy et al. Implementation Science
- A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes
- (2014) Rachel McEvoy et al. Implementation Science
- Prescriber barriers and enablers to minimising potentially inappropriate medications in adults: a systematic review and thematic synthesis
- (2014) Kristen Anderson et al. BMJ Open
- Using computer decision support systems in NHS emergency and urgent care: ethnographic study using normalisation process theory
- (2013) Catherine Pope et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Health care experiences of people with dementia and their caregivers: a meta-ethnographic analysis of qualitative studies
- (2013) J. C. Prorok et al. CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL
- Better together? a naturalistic qualitative study of inter-professional working in collaborative care for co-morbid depression and physical health problems
- (2013) Sarah E Knowles et al. Implementation Science
- Clinical effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in UK primary care (CADET): cluster randomised controlled trial
- (2013) D. A. Richards et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Uncovering Treatment Burden as a Key Concept for Stroke Care: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Research
- (2013) Katie Gallacher et al. PLOS MEDICINE
- Collaborative Care to Improve the Management of Depressive Disorders
- (2012) Anilkrishna B. Thota et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
- (2012) Allison Tong et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review
- (2012) Frances S Mair et al. BULLETIN OF THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION
- Implementation of the CALM intervention for anxiety disorders: a qualitative study
- (2012) Geoffrey M Curran et al. Implementation Science
- Implementing nutrition guidelines for older people in residential care homes: a qualitative study using Normalization Process Theory
- (2012) Claire Bamford et al. Implementation Science
- Implementing a stepped-care approach in primary care: results of a qualitative study
- (2012) Gerdien Franx et al. Implementation Science
- Care Managers' Experiences in a Collaborative Care Program for High Risk Mothers with Depression
- (2012) Hsiang Huang et al. PSYCHOSOMATICS
- Designing Payment for Collaborative Care for Depression in Primary Care
- (2011) Yuhua Bao et al. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- What work has to be done to implement collaborative care for depression? Process evaluation of a trial utilizing the Normalization Process Model
- (2010) Linda Gask et al. Implementation Science
- Embedding effective depression care: using theory for primary care organisational and systems change
- (2010) Jane M Gunn et al. Implementation Science
- A Case Study of Early Experience with Implementation of Collaborative Care in the Veterans Health Administration
- (2010) Ming Tai–Seale et al. Population Health Management
- Development of a theory of implementation and integration: Normalization Process Theory
- (2009) Carl R May et al. Implementation Science
- Care Management for Depression in Primary Care Practice: Findings From the RESPECT-Depression Trial
- (2008) P. A. Nutting et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Exposing the key functions of a complex intervention for shared care in mental health: case study of a process evaluation
- (2008) Richard Byng et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started