4.7 Article

Integrative Modeling of PROTAC-Mediated Ternary Complexes

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 21, Pages 16271-16281

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.1c01576

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575128, 81773632, 21907084]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LZ19H300001]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2020QNA7003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) represent an emerging drug discovery technology that selectively induce targeted protein degradation. PROTAC-Model, an integrative computational method, was developed to predict PROTAC-mediated ternary complex structures and showed better performance in rational design of PROTACs.
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs), which selectively induce targeted protein degradation, represent an emerging drug discovery technology. Although numerous PROTACs have been reported, designing potent PROTACs still remains a great challenge, to some extent, due to insufficient structural data of Target-PROTAC-E3 ternary complexes. In this work, PROTAC-Model, an integrative computational method by combining the FRODOCK-based protocol and RosettaDock-based refinement, was developed to predict PROTAC-mediated ternary complex structures and tested on 14 cases. The quality of the models was evaluated using the criteria of the critical assessment of predicted interactions (CAPRI). Using the unbound structures, the FRODOCK-based protocol can generate the ternary complex structures with medium or high quality for 8 cases out of 14. With the refinement by RosettaDock, the cases with medium or high quality increase to 12. Compared with PRosettaC and the method developed by Drummond et al., PROTAC-Model shows better performance. In summary, PROTAC-Model should be useful for the rational design of PROTACs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available