Evidence‐basing for quality improvement; bringing clinical practice guidelines closer to their promise of improving care practices
Published 2022 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Evidence‐basing for quality improvement; bringing clinical practice guidelines closer to their promise of improving care practices
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Wiley
Online
2022-01-28
DOI
10.1111/jep.13659
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Over half of clinical practice guidelines use non-systematic methods to inform recommendations: A methods study
- (2021) Carole Lunny et al. PLoS One
- From “getting things right” to “getting things right now”: Developing COVID ‐19 guidance under time pressure and knowledge uncertainty
- (2021) Marjolein Moleman et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Assessing the quality of seven clinical practice guidelines from four professional regulatory bodies in Quebec: What's the verdict?
- (2020) Gabrielle Ciquier et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- Development and Validation of a Tool to Assess the Quality of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations
- (2020) Melissa C. Brouwers et al. JAMA Network Open
- Factors Associated With High-Quality Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Management of Chronic Diseases in Primary Care
- (2019) Caroline de Godoi Rezende Costa Molino et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Scientism recognizes evidence only of the quantitative/general variety
- (2019) Charles J. Kowalski et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- The evolution of GRADE (part 3): A framework built on science or faith?
- (2018) Mathew Mercuri et al. JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- A Philosophical Approach to Addressing Uncertainty in Medical Education
- (2018) Mark R. Tonelli et al. ACADEMIC MEDICINE
- Improvement evident but still necessary in clinical practice guideline quality: a systematic review
- (2017) James Jacob Armstrong et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Stakeholder-Driven Quality Improvement: A Compelling Force for Clinical Practice Guidelines
- (2017) Richard M. Rosenfeld et al. OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both
- (2017) Beverley J Shea et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- GRADE Methods for Guideline Development: Time to Evolve?
- (2016) Susan L. Norris et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Guide to clinical practice guidelines: the current state of play
- (2016) Tamara Kredo et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE
- ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed
- (2016) Penny Whiting et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- When is good, good enough? Methodological pragmatism for sustainable guideline development
- (2015) George P Browman et al. Implementation Science
- Reconciling evidence-based medicine and patient-centred care: defining evidence-based inputs to patient-centred decisions
- (2015) Robert R. Weaver JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
- PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews
- (2014) Abigail M Methley et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Being ‘evidence-based’ in the absence of evidence: The management of non-evidence in guideline development
- (2013) Loes Knaapen SOCIAL STUDIES OF SCIENCE
- Quality varies across clinical practice guidelines for mammography screening in women aged 40–49 years as assessed by AGREE and AMSTAR instruments
- (2011) Brittany U. Burda et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- AGREE II: Advancing guideline development, reporting, and evaluation in health care
- (2010) Melissa C. Brouwers et al. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Understanding non-adherence in chronic heart failure: a mixed-method case study
- (2010) M. Oertle et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Pragmatic evidence and textual arrangements: A case study of French clinical cancer guidelines
- (2010) Loes Knaapen et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started