4.7 Article

The quantification of methane emissions and assessment of emissions data for the largest natural gas supply chains

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 320, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128856

Keywords

Methane emissions; Emissions intensity; Natural gas supply chains; Emissions data

Funding

  1. Sustainable Gas Institute
  2. Imperial College London
  3. Royal Dutch Shell
  4. Enagas S.A.
  5. FAPESP
  6. CNPQ
  7. SNAM
  8. NERC
  9. EPSRC
  10. Horizon 2020 programmes

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Methane emissions from natural gas supply chains are a significant source of greenhouse gas emissions. This study estimates emissions variation and uncertainty, highlighting countries at risk of high emissions. The study also shows a high dependency on Tier 1 emission factors, indicating uncertainty and potential inaccuracies in emission accounting.
Methane emitted from natural gas supply chains are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions, but there is uncertainty on the magnitude of emissions, how they vary, and which key factors influence emissions. This study estimates the variation in emissions across the major natural gas supply chains, alongside an estimate of uncertainty which helps identify the areas at the greatest emissions `risk'. Based on the data, we estimate that 26.4 Mt CH4 (14.5-48.2 Mt CH4) was emitted by these supply chains in 2017. The risk assessment identified a significant proportion of countries to be at high risk of high emissions. However, there is a large dependency on Tier 1 emission factors, inferring a high degree of uncertainty and a risk of inaccurate emission accounting. When emissions are recalculated omitting Tier 1 data, emissions reduce by 47% to 3.8-fold, downstream and upstream respectively, across regions. More efforts in collecting robust and transparent primary data should be made, particularly in Non-Annex 1 countries, to improve our understanding of methane emissions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available