4.6 Article

The Warming Climate Aggravates Atmospheric Nitrogen Pollution in Australia

Journal

RESEARCH
Volume 2021, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.34133/2021/9804583

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41822701, 41773068]
  2. National Key Research and Development Project of China [2018YFC0213300]
  3. Discovery Early Career Researcher Award of the Australian Research Council [DE170100423]
  4. Australia-China Joint Research Centre of Healthy Soils for Sustainable Food Production and Environmental Quality [ACSRF48165]
  5. UK Natural Environment Research Council (NERC) [NE/R000131/1, NE/R016429/1]
  6. NERC [NE/R000131/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Australia has a high ratio of reactive nitrogen losses to air compared to water, with emissions increasing significantly over the years leading to substantial health costs. These emissions are closely tied to economic growth, highlighting the importance of reducing nitrogen losses for sustainable development in the country.
Australia is a warm country with well-developed agriculture and a highly urbanized population. How these specific features impact the nitrogen cycle, emissions, and consequently affect environmental and human health is not well understood. Here, we find that the ratio of reactive nitrogen (Nr) losses to air over losses to water in Australia is 1.6 as compared to values less than 1.1 in the USA, the European Union, and China. Australian Nr emissions to air increased bymore than 70% between 1961 and 2013, from 1.2Tg N yr(1) to 2.1Tg N yr(1). Previous emissions were substantially underestimated mainly due to neglecting the warming climate. The estimated health cost from atmospheric Nr emissions in Australia is 4.6 billion US dollars per year. Emissions of Nr to the environment are closely correlated with economic growth, and reduction of Nr losses to air is a priority for sustainable development in Australia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available