4.7 Review

Recent Progress in Nanotechnology for COVID-19 Prevention, Diagnostics and Treatment

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 11, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano11071788

Keywords

COVID-19; nanomaterials; prevention; diagnostics; treatment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The COVID-19 pandemic poses an unprecedented public health threat, and there is a need for alternative approaches to combat the virus. Nanotechnology is being used for prevention, diagnostics, and treatment of COVID-19, offering various benefits through the use of different nanomaterials. The review article discusses the crucial role of nanomaterials in responding to the pandemic, highlighting their applications and potential challenges.
The COVID-19 pandemic is currently an unprecedented public health threat. The rapid spread of infections has led to calls for alternative approaches to combat the virus. Nanotechnology is taking root against SARS-CoV-2 through prevention, diagnostics and treatment of infections. In light of the escalating demand for managing the pandemic, a comprehensive review that highlights the role of nanomaterials in the response to the pandemic is highly desirable. This review article comprehensively discusses the use of nanotechnology for COVID-19 based on three main categories: prevention, diagnostics and treatment. We first highlight the use of various nanomaterials including metal nanoparticles, carbon-based nanoparticles and magnetic nanoparticles for COVID-19. We critically review the benefits of nanomaterials along with their applications in personal protective equipment, vaccine development, diagnostic device fabrication and therapeutic approaches. The remaining key challenges and future directions of nanomaterials for COVID-19 are briefly discussed. This review is very informative and helpful in providing guidance for developing nanomaterial-based products to fight against COVID-19.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available