Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Determinants of individuals’ belief in fake news: A scoping review determinants of belief in fake news
Authors
Keywords
Facebook, Social media, Cognition, Emotions, Deception, Reasoning, Reflection, Religion
Journal
PLoS One
Volume 16, Issue 6, Pages e0253717
Publisher
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
Online
2021-06-25
DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0253717
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2016 US election
- (2020) Andrew M. Guess et al. Nature Human Behaviour
- Evaluating the fake news problem at the scale of the information ecosystem
- (2020) Jennifer Allen et al. Science Advances
- A digital media literacy intervention increases discernment between mainstream and false news in the United States and India
- (2020) Andrew M. Guess et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
- Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook
- (2019) Andrew Guess et al. Science Advances
- Combating Fake News on Social Media with Source Ratings: The Effects of User and Expert Reputation Ratings
- (2019) Antino Kim et al. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS
- Priming critical thinking: Simple interventions limit the influence of fake news about climate change on Facebook
- (2019) Lauren Lutzke et al. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS
- The science of fake news
- (2018) David M. J. Lazer et al. SCIENCE
- PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation
- (2018) Andrea C. Tricco et al. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon
- (2017) Briony Swire et al. Royal Society Open Science
- Neutralizing misinformation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their influence
- (2017) John Cook et al. PLoS One
- What makes us think? A three-stage dual-process model of analytic engagement
- (2015) Gordon Pennycook et al. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY
- Google Scholar, Scopus and the Web of Science: a longitudinal and cross-disciplinary comparison
- (2015) Anne-Wil Harzing et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis
- (2015) Philippe Mongeon et al. SCIENTOMETRICS
- Determinants of Unlawful File Sharing: A Scoping Review
- (2015) Steven James Watson et al. PLoS One
- The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
- (2015) Neal Robert Haddaway et al. PLoS One
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started