4.6 Article

Tissue Distribution Study of Poloxamer188 in Rats by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Quadrupole Time of Flight/Mass Spectrometry with MSALL-Based Approach

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 26, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules26185644

Keywords

poloxamer188; UHPLC-Q-TOF; MS; tissue distribution; quantitative analysis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81773692]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project from the Department of science and technology of Jilin Province [20180101187JC]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study established an LC-MS method for quantitative analysis of PL188 in biological substrates and found that PL188 mainly accumulated in the kidney in SD rats. This provides references for further research on PL188 distribution.
Poloxamer188 (PL188), as one of the most commonly used pharmaceutical excipients, has unique physicochemical properties and good biocompatibility, and so is playing an increasingly extensive role in the field of medicine. Currently, there are few studies on the tissue distribution of PL188 in vivo. In this study, the LC-MS method based on MSALL technique of quadrupole time of flight mass spectrometry for absolute quantitative analysis of poloxamer 188 in biological substrates was established for the first time. The tissue distribution of poloxamer188 in SD rats were studied using the established quantitative analysis method. To explore the distribution of PL188 in organs and tissues, PL188 was administered via rat tail vein at a dose of 5 mg/kg. Eight kinds of tissues including heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, stomach, muscle and brain of rats were collected at 0.25 h, 1 h and 4 h after administration. Tissue distributions showed the highest level was observed in kidney, then in stomach, which indicated PL188 mainly bioaccumulated in the kidney. This study can provide references for the further study of PL188.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available