4.7 Article

The expression of tumour suppressors and proto-oncogenes in tissues susceptible to their hereditary cancers

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 113, Issue 2, Pages 345-353

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2015.205

Keywords

tumor suppressors; proto-oncogenes; familial cancer; Peto's paradox; gene expression

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Studies of familial cancers have found that only a small subset of tissues are affected by inherited mutations in a given tumour suppressor gene (TSG) or proto-oncogene (POG), even though the mutation is present in all tissues. Previous tests have shown that tissue specificity is not due to the presence vs absence of gene expression, as TSGs and POGs are expressed in nearly every type of normal human tissue. Using published microarray expression data we tested the related hypothesis that tissue-specific expression of a TSG or POG is highest in tissue where it is of oncogenic importance. Methods: We tested this hypothesis by examining whether individual TSGs and POGs had higher expression in the normal (noncancerous) tissues where they are implicated in familial cancers relative to those tissues where they are not. We examined data for 15 TSGs and 8 POGs implicated in familial cancer across 12 human tissue types. Results: We found a significant difference between expression levels in susceptible vs nonsusceptible tissues. It was found that 9 (60%, P<0.001) of the TSGs and 5 (63%, P<0.001) of the POGs had their highest expression level in the tissue type susceptible to their oncogenic effect. Conclusions: This highly significant association supports the hypothesis that mutation of a specific TSG or POG is likely to be most oncogenic in the tissue where the gene has its highest level of expression. This suggests that high expression in normal tissues is a potential marker for linking cancer-related genes with their susceptible tissues.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Ecology

The guardians of inherited oncogenic vulnerabilities

Audrey Arnal, Tazzio Tissot, Beata Ujvari, Leonard Nunney, Eric Solary, Lucie Laplane, Francois Bonhomme, Marion Vittecoq, Aurelie Tasiemski, Francois Renaud, Pascal Pujol, Benjamin Roche, Frederic Thomas

EVOLUTION (2016)

Editorial Material Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Commentary: The multistage model of carcinogenesis, Peto's paradox and evolution

Leonard Nunney

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)

Editorial Material Oncology

Overestimating the Role of Environment in Cancers

Robert Noble, Oliver Kaltz, Leonard Nunney, Michael E. Hochberg

CANCER PREVENTION RESEARCH (2016)

Article Multidisciplinary Sciences

Host and symbiont genetic contributions to fitness in a Trichogramma-Wolbachia symbiosis

James E. Russell, Leonard Nunney, Michael Saum, Richard Stouthamer

PEERJ (2018)

Article Biology

Size matters: height, cell number and a person's risk of cancer

Leonard Nunney

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2018)

Article Evolutionary Biology

Identifying key questions in the ecology and evolution of cancer

Antoine M. Dujon, Athena Aktipis, Catherine Alix-Panabieres, Sarah R. Amend, Amy M. Boddy, Joel S. Brown, Jean-Pascal Capp, James DeGregori, Paul Ewald, Robert Gatenby, Marco Gerlinger, Mathieu Giraudeau, Rodrigo K. Hamede, Elsa Hansen, Irina Kareva, Carlo C. Maley, Andriy Marusyk, Nicholas McGranahan, Michael J. Metzger, Aurora M. Nedelcu, Robert Noble, Leonard Nunney, Kenneth J. Pienta, Kornelia Polyak, Pascal Pujol, Andrew F. Read, Benjamin Roche, Susanne Sebens, Eric Solary, Katerina Stankova, Holly Swain Ewald, Frederic Thomas, Beata Ujvari

Summary: The integration of ecological and evolutionary principles into cancer research has become increasingly important in the past 50 years. It is crucial to broaden the research directions and stimulate novel approaches at the interface of oncology and ecological and evolutionary sciences. Effective cross-disciplinary collaborations among experts in ecology, evolution, and cancer are essential to address current and future questions about cancer.

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS (2021)

Article Biology

Determining cancer risk: the evolutionary multistage model or total stem cell divisions?

Leonard Nunney, Kevin Thai

PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES (2020)

Article Evolutionary Biology

Cancer suppression and the evolution of multiple retrogene copies of TP53 in elephants: A re-evaluation

Leonard Nunney

Summary: This study investigates the origin and evolution of 19 tumor suppressor genes in African elephants. The findings suggest that these genes primarily accumulated through segmental duplication and drift, rather than spreading through selection. The enhanced sensitivity of elephant cells to DNA damage may be attributed to one or a few tumor suppressor genes favored by selection.

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS (2022)

Article Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Telomeres, the loop tying cancer to organismal life-histories

Beata Ujvari, Nynke Raven, Thomas Madsen, Marcel Klaassen, Antoine M. Dujon, Aaron G. Schultz, Leonard Nunney, Jean-Francois Lemaitre, Mathieu Giraudeau, Frederic Thomas

Summary: Recent developments in telomere and cancer evolutionary ecology have shown that there is a complex relationship between tissue repair and controlling abnormally proliferating cells. The trade-off is balanced by natural and sexual selection as well as intrinsic and environmental factors. Studies indicate that the relationship between telomere length and cancer risk is likely nonlinear, with evidence suggesting that both long and short telomeres may be associated with increased cancer risk. Accurate interpretation of telomere-cancer dynamics requires an integrative and multidisciplinary approach.

MOLECULAR ECOLOGY (2022)

No Data Available