4.7 Article

What's the choice for goji: Lycium barbarum L. or L. chinense Mill.?

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
Volume 276, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2021.114185

Keywords

Lycium; Goji; Biological origin; Historical use; Gazetteer

Funding

  1. International Postdoctoral Exchange Fellowship Program (2018)
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2019M660552]
  3. CAMS Initiative for Innovative Medicine [2016I2M2003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Goji berries have been traditionally used for food and medicine for over a millennium, with the fruits of L. barbarum and L. chinense being interchangeably used since at least 682 CE. While L. barbarum is recognized for its superior quality, the more accessible fruits of L. chinense were commonly used as equivalents. Further scientific evidence is needed to ensure the safe and effective use of both species.
Ethnopharmacological relevance: For over one millennium, goji berries have been used traditionally as food and medicine in eastern Asia. In recent decades, it has become increasingly popular globally. However, the biocultural development of goji is poorly known. The botanical origin of goji is controversial: in many but not all modern regional or international quality standards, L. barbarum is accepted exclusively as the botanical origin of goji. Aim of the study: Focusing on historical, biogeographical, botanical, phytochemical and pharmacological data, the overarching aim is to understand the biological origin of goji's historical uses, as well as whether the two species can be used interchangeably. Materials and methods: The taxonomic literature on L. barbarum and L. chinense were analysed, followed by a study of botanical specimens and fieldwork. Historical herbals and gazetteers were employed to define the historical producing areas and medical properties of goji. An identification of the species used in history was carried out. In a final step the phytochemical and pharmacological literature on the species was compared. Results and discussion: Due to their morphological similarity and different accessibility, fruits of both L. barbarum and L. chinense have been used interchangeably as food and medicine at least since 682 CE. While the fruit of L. barbarum was recognized to be superior in quality, the fruit of L. chinense was commonly used as an equivalent because of its easier accessibility. Cultivation of L. barbarum in China since 1960s improved its availability, which likely lead to its exclusive use as source of goji in China. The long-term safe use with no reported major safety concerns supports that these two species both are useful sources for medicinal Lycium. Conclusions: Medicinal plants had been used traditionally long before they were named in scientific nomenclature system. Therefore, the understanding of traditional herbal knowledge and the adequate use of those traditional medicines require a reliable identification based on archival records. This study developed an approach for the identification of species used historically, with an integrated analysis of specimens, historical herbals, and national gazetteers. Additionally, their different chemical profiles and pharmacological activities indicate that they should not be used interchangeably. Further scientific evidence is required for their safe and effective use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available