4.8 Article

Unified Disturbance-Estimation-Based Control and Equivalence With IMC and PID: Case Study on a DC-DC Boost Converter

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS
Volume 68, Issue 6, Pages 5122-5132

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIE.2020.2987269

Keywords

Observers; Bandwidth; Adaptive control; Robust control; Mathematical model; Uncertainty; Active disturbance rejection control (ADRC); dc– dc boost converter; two-degree-of-freedom (2DoF) control structure; uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a method of integrating desired dynamics into the nominal model in disturbance-estimation control, which combines feedback and feed-forward controllers, restructuring two popular control techniques into a unified form and providing simplified explanations and tuning rules for PID controllers based on unified ADRC parameters. Performance evaluation on a non-minimum phase DC-DC boost converter shows the effectiveness of the unified control scheme in handling line and load disturbances.
In the context of disturbance-estimation (DE)-based control, it is reported that including desired dynamics into the nominal model yields a simple and compact control law that is easier to implement. The resulting control structure unifies the nominal feedback controller and feed-forward disturbance compensator to formulate an overall feed-forward disturbance compensation problem. Based on this, two popular DE-based techniques, namely active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) and uncertainty and disturbance estimator (UDE)-based control, are restructured into a unified form. By reformulating the controllers in the frequency domain, it is shown that the two structures are equivalent provided the UDE filter is selected based on the observer designed for ADRC. For an easier understanding of practitioners who are familiar with the conventional control structures, the designed controllers are reinterpreted in the framework of two-degree-of-freedom (2DoF) internal model control and 2DoF proportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller to show the equivalence among them. Tuning rules for PID controllers in terms of unified ADRC parameters are also presented to aid practical implementation in industry. Performance of the unified control scheme is evaluated on a non-minimum phase dc-dc boost converter that is operating under line and load disturbances using simulation and experimental study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Automation & Control Systems

On Active Disturbance Rejection Control in Presence of Measurement Noise

Saif Ahmad, Ahmad Ali

Summary: This research proposes a low-power higher order extended state observer (ESO) to overcome the limitations of active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) technique, such as sensitivity to high-frequency measurement noise and complicated numerical implementation. The analysis also reveals the similarity between a recently proposed cascade ESO (CESO) and higher-order ESO. A case study on a dc-dc boost converter demonstrates the practical advantages of the proposed scheme, including improved immunity to high-frequency measurement noise, precise regulation in the presence of time-varying disturbance, low observer gains, and ease of tuning due to a single observer parameter.

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS (2022)

No Data Available