Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Uptake and acceptability of a mainstreaming model of hereditary cancer multigene panel testing among patients with ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
GENETICS IN MEDICINE
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-07-14
DOI
10.1038/s41436-021-01262-2
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Cascading After Peridiagnostic Cancer Genetic Testing: An Alternative to Population-Based Screening
- (2020) Kenneth Offit et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Mainstream consent programs for genetic counseling in cancer patients: A systematic review
- (2020) Tahlia Scheinberg et al. Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models in the United States: Assessment of changes in use from 2010 to 2017
- (2020) Samantha E. Greenberg et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- The impact of communicating uncertain test results in cancer genetic counseling: A systematic mixed studies review
- (2020) Niki M. Medendorp et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Re-examining the Ethics of Genetic Counselling in the Genomic Era
- (2020) Will Schupmann et al. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
- Clinical and psychological outcomes of receiving a variant of uncertain significance from multigene panel testing or genomic sequencing: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- (2020) Chloe Mighton et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Psychosocial outcomes following germline multigene panel testing in an ethnically and economically diverse cohort of patients
- (2020) Julie O. Culver et al. CANCER
- Next-generation sequencing in precision oncology: Patient understanding and expectations
- (2019) J. Scott Roberts et al. Cancer Medicine
- Family communication and patient distress after germline genetic testing in individuals with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- (2019) Mary Linton B. Peters et al. CANCER
- Psychosocial Effects of Multigene Panel Testing in the Context of Cancer Genomics
- (2019) Jada G. Hamilton et al. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Mainstreamed genetic testing in ovarian cancer: patient experience of the testing process
- (2019) Laura McLeavy et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER
- Cancer patients' expectations when undergoing extensive molecular diagnostics—A qualitative study
- (2019) Amy Rohrmoser et al. PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
- Evaluation of a Streamlined Oncologist-Led BRCA Mutation Testing and Counseling Model for Patients With Ovarian Cancer
- (2018) Nicoletta Colombo et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Patients’ Views of Treatment-Focused Genetic Testing (TFGT): Some Lessons for the Mainstreaming of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Testing
- (2018) Sarah Wright et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results
- (2018) Angela R Bradbury et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Quality of Life in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer and Their Caregivers
- (2018) Margaret R. Bauer et al. PANCREAS
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone vs In-Person Disclosure of Germline Cancer Genetic Test Results
- (2018) Angela R Bradbury et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Disparities in genetic services utilization in a random sample of young breast cancer survivors
- (2018) Christos Nikolaidis et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Next-Generation Service Delivery: A Scoping Review of Patient Outcomes Associated with Alternative Models of Genetic Counseling and Genetic Testing for Hereditary Cancer
- (2018) Jeanna McCuaig et al. Cancers
- Streamlined genetic education is effective in preparing women newly diagnosed with breast cancer for decision making about treatment-focused genetic testing: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial
- (2016) Veronica F. Quinn et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Analysis of Advantages, Limitations, and Barriers of Genetic Counseling Service Delivery Models
- (2016) Stephanie A. Cohen et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Alternate Service Delivery Models in Cancer Genetic Counseling: A Mini-Review
- (2016) Adam Hudson Buchanan et al. Frontiers in Oncology
- Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients
- (2016) Angela George et al. Scientific Reports
- BRCA1/2 testing in newly diagnosed breast and ovarian cancer patients without prior genetic counselling: the DNA-BONus study
- (2015) Hildegunn Høberg-Vetti et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Concerns About Cancer Risk and Experiences With Genetic Testing in a Diverse Population of Patients With Breast Cancer
- (2015) Reshma Jagsi et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- American Society of Clinical Oncology Policy Statement Update: Genetic and Genomic Testing for Cancer Susceptibility
- (2015) Mark E. Robson et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Randomized Noninferiority Trial of Telephone Versus In-Person Genetic Counseling for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer
- (2014) Marc D. Schwartz et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
- Expanding Access to BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling with Telephone Delivery: A Cluster Randomized Trial
- (2014) A. Y. Kinney et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological Studies
- (2010) Henian Chen et al. COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION
- Evaluating the Psychological Effects of Genetic Testing in Symptomatic Patients: A Systematic Review
- (2009) Fleur Vansenne et al. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers
- Emotional distress following genetic testing for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: A meta-analytic review.
- (2009) Jada G. Hamilton et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreDiscover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversation