4.7 Article

Comparison of characteristic components in tea-leaves fermented by Aspergillus pallidofulvus PT-3, Aspergillus sesamicola PT-4 and Penicillium manginii PT-5 using LC-MS metabolomics and HPLC analysis

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 350, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129228

Keywords

Ripened Pu-erh tea; Fermentation; Fungi; Metabolomics; Phenolic compounds; Flavonoids

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31960617]
  2. Modern Agricultural Tea Industry System of Yunnan Province, China [2017KJTX007]
  3. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS23]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that different fungal strains have significant effects on the quality and chemical composition of ripened Pu-erh tea, with ApaPT and AsePT contributing to the synthesis of specific compounds such as gallic acid and flavonoids.
Microbiota influenced quality formation of ripened Pu-erh tea. To understand the effect of each tea-derived fungal strain, tea-leaves were fermented by Aspergillus pallidofulvus PT-3 (ApaPT), Aspergillus sesamicola PT-4 (AsePT) and Penicillium manginii PT-5 (PmaPT), respectively. 14 Phenolic compounds, 3 purine alkaloids, 19 free amino acids and ?-aminobutyric acid contents were determined by HPLC and amino acid analyzer analysis. Additionally, UHPLC-Q-TOF/MS method was developed for LC-MS metabolomics analysis. Multivariate statistical analyses, such as PCA and HCA, exhibited that the chemical profile of PmaPT fermentation was similar to biocidal treatment, but had significant differences with ApaPT and AsePT fermentation. The differentiated metabolites (VIP 0.05 and FC 1.50 or < 0.66) and one-way ANOVA revealed the impact of three fungal strains in tea-leaves fermentation. APaPT and AsePT contributed to biosynthesis of gallic acid and several flavonoids, such as kaempferol, quercetin and myricetin in the metabolism of phenolic compounds.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available