Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109867
Keywords
Gastrointestinal system cancer; Liver metastasis; (18)FDG-PET/CT; Ga-68-DOTATA-FAPI-PET/CT
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This study compared the diagnostic performance of PET/CT using Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI and (18)FDG in detecting liver metastases in patients with GIS cancers. The results showed that Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT was superior to (18)FDG-PET/CT in detecting liver metastases, with significant differences in lesion-based comparisons and semi-quantitative values.
Purpose: We aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of PET/CT imaging performed with Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI and (18)FDG in detection of liver metastases in patients with gastrointestinal system (GIS) cancer. Methods: A total of 31 patients who underwent Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI and F-18-FDG PET/CT examinations and diagnosed with GIS cancer (15 colorectal, 9 pancreas, 4 stomach and 3 other cancers) were included in the study. The presence of liver metastasis was decided based on histopathologic diagnosis, PET/CT, other radiologic examinations or tumor biomarker findings, and both PET/CT imaging findings were compared on the patient and lesion basis. Results: Of the 31 patients, 28 were found as true positive with Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT and 17 with (18)FDG-PET/CT. Of the 98 metastatic liver lesions determined according to our diagnostic criteria, 92 were found as true positive lesions with Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT and 65 with (18)FDG-PET/CT. There was a statistically significant difference between both imaging modalities in the patient and lesion based comparisons (p < 0.05). When semiquantitative values (SUVmax, mlr) obtained from the lesions were compared between the two imaging methods, mlr values showed statistically significant difference in all tumor subgroups (p < 0.05). Conclusion: It was concluded that Ga-68-DOTA-FAPI-PET/CT was superior over (18)FDG-PET/CT in detection of liver metastases of GIS cancers and it can be a complementary method especially in negative cases with (18)FDG-PET/ CT.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available