Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women’s views on good motherhood: a qualitative study
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and pregnant women’s views on good motherhood: a qualitative study
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-08-17
DOI
10.1038/s41431-021-00945-3
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Decision-making about non-invasive prenatal testing: women’s moral reasoning in the absence of a risk of miscarriage in Germany
- (2020) Stefan Reinsch et al. NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY
- Facilitating informed choice about non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT): a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis of women’s experiences
- (2019) Alexandra Cernat et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
- (2019) Hilary Bowman-Smart et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- (2019) Eline M. Bunnik et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands
- (2019) Karuna R.M. van der Meij et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Termination of pregnancy following a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: A qualitative study of the decision-making process of pregnant couples
- (2018) Stina Lou et al. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA
- Women’s perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions
- (2018) Meredith Vanstone et al. BMC Medical Ethics
- Women's decision making regarding prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy: A qualitative comparison between 2003 and 2016
- (2018) Metje J. van Bruggen et al. MIDWIFERY
- The Shifting Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Between Reproductive Autonomy and Public Health
- (2017) Vardit Ravitsky HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part II-women's perspectives
- (2016) Rachèl V. van Schendel et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Reasons for accepting or declining Down syndrome screening in Dutch prospective mothers within the context of national policy and healthcare system characteristics: a qualitative study
- (2016) Neeltje M. T. H. Crombag et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- Positive predictive value of non-invasive prenatal screening for fetal chromosome disorders using cell-free DNA in maternal serum: independent clinical experience of a tertiary referral center
- (2015) Whitney A. Neufeld-Kaiser et al. BMC Medicine
- Genomic futures of prenatal screening: ethical reflection
- (2015) W.J. Dondorp et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
- (2015) Wybo Dondorp et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidies with cell-free DNA in the general pregnancy population: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- (2015) Genevieve Fairbrother et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for fetal aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis
- (2015) M. M. Gil et al. ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health
- (2014) Stephen Wilkinson BIOETHICS
- Prenatal Screening: An Ethical Agenda for the Near Future
- (2014) Antina de Jong et al. BIOETHICS
- Explaining variation in Down’s syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews
- (2014) Neeltje MTH Crombag et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening
- (2014) Rachèl V van Schendel et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Factors affecting the uptake of prenatal screening tests for congenital anomalies; a multicentre prospective cohort study
- (2014) Janneke T Gitsels - van der Wal et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
- It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
- (2014) Ruth Farrell et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Abortion, infanticide and allowing babies to die, 40 years on
- (2013) Julian Savulescu JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Women and their partners' preferences for Down's syndrome screening tests: a discrete choice experiment
- (2013) Fran E. Carroll et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Down's Syndrome: Pregnant Women's Views and Likely Uptake
- (2013) C. Lewis et al. Public Health Genomics
- Parental duties and prenatal screening: Does an offer of prenatal screening lead women to believe that they are morally compelled to test?
- (2011) Elisa García et al. MIDWIFERY
- Changes in fetal prevalence and outcome for trisomies 13 and 18: a population-based study over 23 years
- (2010) Claire Irving et al. Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
- With new prenatal testing, will babies with Down syndrome slowly disappear?
- (2009) B. G Skotko ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: an ethical imperative
- (2009) Vardit Ravitsky NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- An offer you can't refuse? Ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
- (2009) Dagmar Schmitz et al. NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS
- Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making
- (2008) Elisa García et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
Find the ideal target journal for your manuscript
Explore over 38,000 international journals covering a vast array of academic fields.
SearchBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started