Women’s perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions
Published 2018 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Women’s perspectives on the ethical implications of non-invasive prenatal testing: a qualitative analysis to inform health policy decisions
Authors
Keywords
Non-invasive prenatal testing, Prenatal screening, Qualitative research, Ethics, Health policy, Patient engagement
Journal
BMC Medical Ethics
Volume 19, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2018-04-16
DOI
10.1186/s12910-018-0267-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Shifting Landscape of Prenatal Testing: Between Reproductive Autonomy and Public Health
- (2017) Vardit Ravitsky HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Toward an Ethically Sensitive Implementation of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening in the Global Context
- (2017) Jessica Mozersky et al. HASTINGS CENTER REPORT
- Clinical, social and ethical issues associated with non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy
- (2017) Blanche Griffin et al. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
- Reconciling ethical and economic conceptions of value in health policy using the capabilities approach: A qualitative investigation of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing
- (2017) Mia Kibel et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics
- (2016) Anthony R. Gregg et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT: A FRAMEWORK FOR ACTION
- (2016) Julia Abelson et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Spanish- and English-Speaking Pregnant Women’s Views on cfDNA and Other Prenatal Screening: Practical and Ethical Reflections
- (2016) Erin Floyd et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- NIPT and Informed Consent: an Assessment of Patient Understanding of a Negative NIPT Result
- (2016) Julie L. Piechan et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
- (2016) Rachèl V. van Schendel et al. Journal of Genetic Counseling
- Women’s Experiences and Preferences for Service Delivery of Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Aneuploidy in a Public Health Setting: A Mixed Methods Study
- (2016) Celine Lewis et al. PLoS One
- Noninvasive Prenatal Genetic Testing: Current and Emerging Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues
- (2015) Mollie A. Minear et al. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics
- Genomic futures of prenatal screening: ethical reflection
- (2015) W.J. Dondorp et al. CLINICAL GENETICS
- Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy
- (2015) Celine Lewis et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
- (2015) Wybo Dondorp et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Global perspectives on clinical adoption of NIPT
- (2015) Mollie A. Minear et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- NIPT-based screening for Down syndrome and beyond: what do pregnant women think?
- (2015) Rachèl V. van Schendel et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of achondroplasia and thanatophoric dysplasia: next-generation sequencing allows for a safer, more accurate, and comprehensive approach
- (2015) Lyn S. Chitty et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Patient and Citizen Participation in Health: The Need for Improved Ethical Support
- (2014) Laura Williamson AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOETHICS
- Prenatal Screening, Reproductive Choice, and Public Health
- (2014) Stephen Wilkinson BIOETHICS
- Prenatal Screening: An Ethical Agenda for the Near Future
- (2014) Antina de Jong et al. BIOETHICS
- Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening
- (2014) Rachèl V van Schendel et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- An easy test but a hard decision: ethical issues concerning non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive disorders
- (2014) Heather Skirton et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Noninvasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive conditions by maternal plasma sequencing in a case of congenital deafness
- (2014) Meng Meng et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Noninvasive Prenatal Testing Goes Global
- (2014) S. Chandrasekharan et al. Science Translational Medicine
- It’s More Than a Blood Test: Patients’ Perspectives on Noninvasive Prenatal Testing
- (2014) Ruth Farrell et al. Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Criteria for fairly allocating scarce health-care resources to genetic tests: which matter most?
- (2013) Wolf H Rogowski et al. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS
- Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States
- (2013) Ashwin Agarwal et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing for Down's Syndrome: Pregnant Women's Views and Likely Uptake
- (2013) C. Lewis et al. Public Health Genomics
- Non-Invasive Chromosomal Evaluation (NICE) Study: results of a multicenter prospective cohort study for detection of fetal trisomy 21 and trisomy 18
- (2012) Mary E. Norton et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Noninvasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy–ready for prime time?
- (2012) Lyn S. Chitty et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY
- Uses of cell free fetal DNA in maternal circulation
- (2012) Melissa Hill et al. BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY
- DNA sequencing of maternal plasma reliably identifies trisomy 18 and trisomy 13 as well as Down syndrome: an international collaborative study
- (2012) Glenn E. Palomaki et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Ethical considerations for choosing between possible models for using NIPD for aneuploidy detection
- (2012) Zuzana Deans et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
- Fetal sex determination using cell-free fetal DNA: service users' experiences of and preferences for service delivery
- (2012) Celine Lewis et al. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS
- Involving citizens in the ethics of biobank research: Informing institutional policy through structured public deliberation
- (2012) Kieran C. O'Doherty et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Eliciting ethical and social values in health technology assessment: A participatory approach
- (2011) Yvonne Bombard et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Patients' perspectives in health technology assessment: A route to robust evidence and fair deliberation
- (2010) Karen Facey et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model
- (2009) Hester M. Van De Bovenkamp et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Ethics in Canadian health technology assessment: A descriptive review
- (2009) Deirdre DeJean et al. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Practical and Ethical Considerations of Noninvasive Prenatal Diagnosis
- (2009) Peter A. Benn JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Will the introduction of non-invasive prenatal diagnostic testing erode informed choices? An experimental study of health care professionals
- (2009) Ananda van den Heuvel et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Genetics on stage: Public engagement in health policy development on preimplantation genetic diagnosis
- (2009) Susan M. Cox et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- The use of cell-free fetal nucleic acids in maternal blood for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
- (2008) C. F. Wright et al. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE
- Why ethics should be part of health technology assessment
- (2008) Bjørn Morten Hofmann INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT IN HEALTH CARE
- Ethical aspects arising from non-invasive fetal diagnosis
- (2008) Ainsley J. Newson Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
Become a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get StartedAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started