4.5 Article

TEMPO-Regulated Regio- and Stereoselective Cross-Dihalogenation with Dual Electrophilic X+ Reagents

Journal

CHINESE JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 39, Issue 11, Pages 3004-3010

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cjoc.202100472

Keywords

Halogenation; Organocatalysis; Electrophilic addition; Redox-regulation; Alkynes

Funding

  1. NSFC [21871096, 22071062, 22001077]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China [2016YFA0602900]
  3. Guangdong Science and Technology Department [2012018B030308007, 2021A1515012331]
  4. China Post doctoral Science Foundation [2018M643062, 2019T120723]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A TEMPO-catalyzed cross-dihalogenation reaction was established through redox-regulation of dual electrophilic X+ reagents, enabling high regioselective access to various halogenated products. It has wide applications in organic synthesis and the intermediacy of halonium ion was confirmed through mechanistic investigations.
Main observation and conclusion A TEMPO catalyzed cross-dihalogenation reaction was established via redox-regulation of the otherwise complex system of dual electrophilic X+ reagents. Formally, the ICl, BrCl, I-2 and Br-2 were generated in-situ, which enabled high regio- or stereoselective access to a myriad of iodochlorination, bromochlorination and homo-dihalogenation products with a wide spectrum of functionalities. With its mild conditions and operational simplicity, this method could enable wide applications in organic synthesis, which was exemplified by divergent synthesis of two pharmaceuticals. Detailed mechanistic investigations via radical clock reaction, pinacol ring expansion and Hammett experiments were conducted, which confirmed the intermediacy of halonium ion. In addition, a dynamic catalytic model based on the versatile catalytic role of TEMPO was proposed to explain the selective outcomes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available