COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
COSMIN reporting guideline for studies on measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Volume -, Issue -, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Online
2021-04-05
DOI
10.1007/s11136-021-02822-4
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study
- (2018) C. B. Terwee et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
- (2018) C. A. C. Prinsen et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures
- (2017) L. B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline
- (2016) Cecilia A. C. Prinsen et al. Trials
- A Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments for Use in Patients With Rotator Cuff Disease
- (2015) Hsiaomin Huang et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE
- The quality of systematic reviews of health-related outcome measurement instruments
- (2015) C. B. Terwee et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Poor patient-reported outcomes reporting according to CONSORT guidelines in randomized clinical trials evaluating systemic cancer therapy
- (2014) O. Bylicki et al. ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY
- Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’
- (2014) Cecilia A C Prinsen et al. Trials
- Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and elaboration
- (2014) Jan P. Vandenbroucke et al. International Journal of Surgery
- How to Make More Published Research True
- (2014) John P. A. Ioannidis PLOS MEDICINE
- The CONSORT Patient-Reported Outcome (PRO) extension: implications for clinical trials and practice
- (2013) Melanie Calvert et al. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials
- (2013) Melanie Calvert et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research
- (2013) Bryce B. Reeve et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Using Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Improved Decision-Making in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer – the Last Clinical Frontier in Surgical Oncology?
- (2013) Kjetil Søreide et al. Frontiers in Oncology
- CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
- (2010) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed
- (2010) Jan Kottner et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- The Missing Voice of Patients in Drug-Safety Reporting
- (2010) Ethan Basch NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Patterns of reporting health-related quality of life outcomes in randomized clinical trials: implications for clinicians and quality of life researchers
- (2010) Michael Brundage et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study
- (2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started