How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” – a practical guideline

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and User Survey

(2016) Sarah L. Gorst et al.   PLoS One

Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain

(2015) Alessandro Chiarotto et al.   EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL

The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Roadmap: A Methodological Framework to Develop Core Sets of Outcome Measurements in Dermatology

(2015) Jochen Schmitt et al.   JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE DERMATOLOGY

Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0

(2014) Maarten Boers et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: A Systematic Review

(2014) Elizabeth Gargon et al.   PLoS One

Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative: protocol for an international Delphi study to achieve consensus on how to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a ‘core outcome set’

(2014) Cecilia A C Prinsen et al.   Trials

Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider

(2012) Paula R Williamson et al.   Trials

The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes

(2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study

(2010) Lidwine B. Mokkink et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence

(2009) Iain Chalmers et al.   LANCET