Epidemiological characteristics and methodological quality of meta-analyses on diabetes mellitus treatment: a systematic review

Are meta-analyses of Chinese herbal medicine trials trustworthy and clinically applicable? A cross-sectional study

(2015) Vincent CH Chung et al.   JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY

Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool

(2015) Robin ST Ho et al.   npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine

Exploring the Quality of Systematic Reviews on Pharmacist Interventions in Patients With Diabetes

(2014) Patricia Melo Aguiar et al.   ANNALS OF PHARMACOTHERAPY

Systematic reviews published in higher impact clinical journals were of higher quality

(2014) Padhraig S. Fleming et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Influence of Reported Study Design Characteristics on Intervention Effect Estimates From Randomized, Controlled Trials

(2013) Jelena Savović et al.   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Prevalence and Control of Diabetes in Chinese Adults

(2013) Yu Xu   JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION

An analysis of quality of systematic reviews on pharmacist health interventions

(2011) Ana Carolina Melchiors et al.   International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

(2009) Beverley J. Shea et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY