Methodological quality of meta-analyses on treatments for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a cross-sectional study using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) tool

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

(2013) David Moher   ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

Quality assessment of systematic reviews or meta-analyses of nursing interventions conducted by Korean reviewers

(2012) Hyun-Ju Seo et al.   BMC Medical Research Methodology

GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence—publication bias

(2011) Gordon H. Guyatt et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Lifetime risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a longitudinal population study

(2011) Andrea S Gershon et al.   LANCET

Evaluation of methodology and quality characteristics of systematic reviews in orthodontics

(2011) SN Papageorgiou et al.   Orthodontics & Craniofacial Research

Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 2008

(2010) Susan L. MacDonald et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

(2009) Beverley J. Shea et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Selective Publication of Antidepressant Trials and Its Influence on Apparent Efficacy

(2008) Erick H. Turner et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias

(2008) Kerry Dwan et al.   PLoS One

Empirical evidence of bias in treatment effect estimates in controlled trials with different interventions and outcomes: meta-epidemiological study

(2008) Lesley Wood et al.   BMJ-British Medical Journal