4.5 Article

Helicobacter pylori infection as a potential favorable factor for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for gastric cancer

Journal

INVESTIGATIONAL NEW DRUGS
Volume 39, Issue 5, Pages 1436-1438

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10637-021-01122-5

Keywords

Helicobacter pylori; Favorable factor; Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy; Gastric cancer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that positive H. pylori status may be a beneficial prognostic factor for ICI therapy in GC patients, with superior outcomes observed in Asian patients compared to North American and European patients. Therefore, emphasizing H. pylori status in ongoing or forthcoming ICI therapy trials could maximize treatment benefits for patients with advanced GC. Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms of inflammation and cancer progression.
Gastric cancer (GC) has the third highest rate of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. First-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced GC led to landmark breakthroughs, but which GC patients are most likely to benefit from ICI therapy needs to be investigated in depth and identified via valuable biomarkers. In this letter, we describe superior outcomes in Asian patients than in North American and European patients treated with ICI therapy, and we speculate that positive H. pylori status may be a beneficial prognostic factor for ICI therapy in patients with GC. Many studies have revealed that H. pylori-activated immune responses improve prognosis in patients with GC via increased PD-L1 expression and CD3(+) T cells. We propose that H. pylori status should be emphasized in ongoing or forthcoming ICI therapy trials to maximize the benefits of treatment for patients with advanced GC. Further research is required to better understand the mechanisms of inflammation and cancer progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available