4.7 Article

Evaluating low- mid- and high-level fusion strategies for combining Raman and infrared spectroscopy for quality assessment of red meat

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 361, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130154

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy; Infrared spectroscopy; Data fusion; Red meat; pH; % IMF; Chemometrics

Funding

  1. University of Otago
  2. New Zealand Ministry of Business, Innovation and Enterprise programme (MBIE) under the MBIE - capturing the value of New Zealand red meat programme [C10X1602CRFRP]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the use of Raman and infrared spectroscopy with three data fusion strategies to predict pH and % IMF content of red meat. Results showed that the high-level fusion strategy performed best in predicting pH, while the low-level fusion strategy showed promise in predicting % IMF. Fusion of data from more than one technique at low and high level resulted in improvement in model performances.
The implementation of Raman and infrared spectroscopy with three data fusion strategies to predict pH and % IMF content of red meat was investigated. Raman and FTIR systems were utilized to assess quality parameters of intact red meat. Quantitative models were built using PLS, with model performances assessed with respect to the determination coefficient (R2), root mean square error and normalized root mean square error (NRMSEP). Results obtained on validation against an independent test set show that the high-level fusion strategy had the best performance in predicting the observed pH; with R2P and NRMSEP values of 0.73 and 12.9% respectively, whereas low-level fusion strategy showed promise in predicting % IMF (NRMSEP = 8.5%). The fusion of data from more than one technique at low and high level resulted in improvement in the model performances; highlighting the possibility of information enhancement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available