4.7 Article

Physicochemical properties and antioxidant activities of tree peony ( Paeonia suffruticosa Andr.) seed protein hydrolysates obtained with different proteases

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 345, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128765

Keywords

Tree peony seed protein; Enzymatic hydrolysates; Physicochemical properties; Antioxidant activities

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the physicochemical and antioxidant properties of tree peony seed protein hydrolysates produced by five different proteases. Among them, Alcalase hydrolysate demonstrated the highest antioxidant activities, suggesting potential applications in the food or pharmaceutical industry.
The physicochemical and antioxidant properties of tree peony seed protein (TPSP) hydrolysates by Alcalase, Neutrase, Papain, Protamex, and Flavourzyme were investigated in this study. The physicochemical properties were characterized by SDS-PAGE, particle size distribution, fourier transform infrared and fluorescence spectroscopy etc. The antioxidant activities were determined by DPPH radical, ABTS radical, Fe2+ chelating, and reducing power. The results showed five proteases produced hydrolysates with a significantly reduced average particle size, alpha-helices, and surface hydrophobicity compared to TPSP. Alcalase and Neutrase hydrolysis enhanced the nutritional value of the hydrolysates. Alcalase hydrolysates possessed the highest degree of hydrolysis (27.97%) and lowest molecular weight (< 13 kDa) with average particle size (231.33 nm). Alcalase hydrolysate displayed the highest radical scavenging (DPPH IC50 = 0.18 mg/mL, ABTS IC50 = 1.57 mg/mL), Fe2+ chelating activity (IC50 = 0.99 mg/mL), and reducing power (0.594). These results provide the fundamentals for TPSP hydrolysates as antioxidants to be employed in food industry or pharmaceutical industry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available