Access to and clinical use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2016 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Access to and clinical use of cardiac implantable electronic devices and interventional electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology Countries: 2016 Report from the European Heart Rhythm Association
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
EUROPACE
Volume 18, Issue suppl 3, Pages iii1-iii79
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Online
2016-08-05
DOI
10.1093/europace/euw244
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- A Leadless Intracardiac Transcatheter Pacing System
- (2016) Dwight Reynolds et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in the European Society of Cardiology countries: 2014 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association
- (2015) M. J. P. Raatikainen et al. EUROPACE
- 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death
- (2015) Silvia G. Priori et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Leadless Cardiac Pacemakers
- (2015) Marc A. Miller et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- Left Atrial Appendage Closure as an Alternative to Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation
- (2015) David R. Holmes et al. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY
- EHRA/HRS/APHRS expert consensus on ventricular arrhythmias
- (2014) C. T. Pedersen et al. EUROPACE
- Statistics on the use of cardiac electronic devices and electrophysiological procedures in 55 ESC countries: 2013 report from the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA)
- (2014) F. Arribas et al. EUROPACE
- Health technology assessment in interventional electrophysiology and device therapy: a position paper of the European Heart Rhythm Association
- (2013) G. Boriani et al. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
- Financial crisis, austerity, and health in Europe
- (2013) Marina Karanikolos et al. LANCET
- The Randomized Registry Trial — The Next Disruptive Technology in Clinical Research?
- (2013) Michael S. Lauer et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- Current practice in transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association EP Network Survey
- (2012) M. G. Bongiorni et al. EUROPACE
- Barriers to implementation of evidence-based electrical therapies and the need for outcome research: role of European registries
- (2011) C. Wolpert et al. EUROPACE
- Summary statement: EHRA Summit 2010 with the Participation of Central-Eastern European Countries: 'ICD for Life' Initiative--Fighting against Sudden Cardiac Death in Emerging Economies
- (2011) B. Merkely et al. EUROPACE
- The role of echocardiography in stroke risk assessment in patients with atrial fibrillation: is it additive or does it simply echo clinical risk factors?
- (2011) R. Pisters et al. EUROPACE
- Health economics and the European Heart Rhythm Association
- (2011) P. Vardas et al. EUROPACE
- Pathways for training and accreditation for transvenous lead extraction: a European Heart Rhythm Association position paper
- (2011) et al. EUROPACE
- Health economics and outcomes research: a new challenge and field of action for the European Heart Rhythm Association
- (2010) G. Boriani et al. EUROPACE
- Management of patients receiving implantable cardiac defibrillator shocks: Recommendations for acute and long-term patient management
- (2010) F. Braunschweig et al. EUROPACE
- An Entirely Subcutaneous Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillator
- (2010) Gust H. Bardy et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started