A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Published 2016 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
A proposed framework for the systematic review and integrated assessment (SYRINA) of endocrine disrupting chemicals
Authors
Keywords
Endocrine disrupting chemicals, Systematic review, Study evaluation, Strength of evidence, Weight of evidence, Adverse effect, Endocrine disrupting activity, Evidence integration, Epidemiology, In vivo
Journal
Environmental Health
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages -
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2016-07-12
DOI
10.1186/s12940-016-0156-6
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- How credible are the study results? Evaluating and applying internal validity tools to literature-based assessments of environmental health hazards
- (2016) Andrew A. Rooney et al. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
- Air Pollution and Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Nested Case–Control Study among Members of a Northern California Health Plan
- (2016) Geneé S. Smith et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- EDC-2: The Endocrine Society's Second Scientific Statement on Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals
- (2015) A. C. Gore et al. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
- Developmental Origins of Health and Disease: Integrating Environmental Influences
- (2015) Jerrold J. Heindel et al. ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Assessing dose–response relationships for endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs): a focus on non-monotonicity
- (2015) R Thomas Zoeller et al. Environmental Health
- Estimating Burden and Disease Costs of Exposure to Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals in the European Union
- (2015) Leonardo Trasande et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
- Using systematic reviews for hazard and risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- (2015) Anna Beronius et al. REVIEWS IN ENDOCRINE & METABOLIC DISORDERS
- A path forward in the debate over health impacts of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- (2015) R Thomas Zoeller et al. Environmental Health
- Bridging the gap between academic research and regulatory health risk assessment of Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals
- (2014) Anna Beronius et al. CURRENT OPINION IN PHARMACOLOGY
- Intersection of Systematic Review Methodology with the NIHReproducibility Initiative
- (2014) Kristina A. Thayer et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Science in Risk Assessment and Policy (SciRAP): An Online Resource for Evaluating and ReportingIn Vivo(Eco)Toxicity Studies
- (2014) Linda Molander et al. HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT
- The Usefulness of Systematic Reviews of Animal Experiments for the Design of Preclinical and Clinical Studies
- (2014) R. B. M. de Vries et al. ILAR JOURNAL
- Facilitating the use of non-standardin vivostudies in health risk assessment of chemicals: a proposal to improve evaluation criteria and reporting
- (2014) Anna Beronius et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED TOXICOLOGY
- Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis of Preclinical Studies: Why Perform Them and How to Appraise Them Critically
- (2014) Emily S Sena et al. JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
- Policy Decisions on Endocrine Disruptors Should Be Based on Science Across Disciplines: A Response to Dietrichet al.
- (2013) A. C. Gore et al. ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Science and policy on endocrine disrupters must not be mixed: a reply to a “common sense” intervention by toxicology journal editors
- (2013) Åke Bergman et al. Environmental Health
- The Impact of Endocrine Disruption: A Consensus Statement on the State of the Science
- (2013) Åke Bergman et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Developing and evaluating communication strategies to support informed decisions and practice based on evidence (DECIDE): protocol and preliminary results
- (2013) Shaun Treweek et al. Implementation Science
- Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: A practical guide
- (2013) H.M. Vesterinen et al. JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
- Early-life prevention of non-communicable diseases
- (2013) John M Balbus et al. LANCET
- Regulatory decisions on endocrine disrupting chemicals should be based on the principles of endocrinology
- (2013) Laura N. Vandenberg et al. REPRODUCTIVE TOXICOLOGY
- Overview of systematic reviews - a new type of study: part I: why and for whom?
- (2013) Valter Silva et al. Sao Paulo Medical Journal
- The influence of study design and sex-differences on results from developmental neurotoxicity studies of bisphenol A, implications for toxicity testing
- (2013) Anna Beronius et al. TOXICOLOGY
- Response to A critique of the European Commission Document, “State of the Art Assessment of Endocrine Disrupters” by Rhomberg and colleagues – letter to the editor
- (2012) Andreas Kortenkamp et al. CRITICAL REVIEWS IN TOXICOLOGY
- Hormones and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: Low-Dose Effects and Nonmonotonic Dose Responses
- (2012) Laura N. Vandenberg et al. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
- Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Public Health Protection: A Statement of Principles from The Endocrine Society
- (2012) R. Thomas Zoeller et al. ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Developmental origins of non-communicable disease: Implications for research and public health
- (2012) Robert Barouki et al. Environmental Health
- GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes
- (2012) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Reporting and evaluation criteria as means towards a transparent use of ecotoxicity data for environmental risk assessment of pharmaceuticals
- (2011) M. Ågerstrand et al. ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
- Forest Plot Viewer
- (2011) Abee L. Boyles et al. EPIDEMIOLOGY
- An Evidence-Based Medicine Methodology To Bridge The Gap Between Clinical And Environmental Health Sciences
- (2011) Tracey J. Woodruff et al. HEALTH AFFAIRS
- Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program
- (2011) Rongwei Fu et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables
- (2011) Gordon Guyatt et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Endocrine disrupting chemicals and disease susceptibility
- (2011) Thaddeus T. Schug et al. JOURNAL OF STEROID BIOCHEMISTRY AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
- Pulling Back the Curtain: Improving Reviews in Environmental Health
- (2010) Tracey J. Woodruff et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Good Laboratory Practices Are Not Synonymous with Good Scientific Practices, Accurate Reporting, or Valid Data
- (2010) Frederick S. vom Saal et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- The GRADE approach and Bradford Hill's criteria for causation
- (2010) H. Schunemann et al. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH
- Flawed Experimental Design Reveals the Need for Guidelines Requiring Appropriate Positive Controls in Endocrine Disruption Research
- (2010) Frederick S. vom Saal et al. TOXICOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals: An Endocrine Society Scientific Statement
- (2009) Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis et al. ENDOCRINE REVIEWS
- A Clash of Old and New Scientific Concepts in Toxicity, with Important Implications for Public Health
- (2009) John Peterson Myers et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
- (2009) David Moher et al. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
- Minireview: The Case for Obesogens
- (2009) Felix Grün et al. MOLECULAR ENDOCRINOLOGY
- Meeting Report: Moving Upstream—Evaluating Adverse Upstream End Points for Improved Risk Assessment and Decision-Making
- (2008) Tracey J. Woodruff et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Why Public Health Agencies Cannot Depend on Good Laboratory Practices as a Criterion for Selecting Data: The Case of Bisphenol A
- (2008) John Peterson Myers et al. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES
- Expert Judgment-Based Risk Assessment Using Statistical Scenario Analysis: A Case Study-Running the Bulls in Pamplona (Spain)
- (2008) Fermín Mallor et al. RISK ANALYSIS
- A Dirty Dozen: Twelve P-Value Misconceptions
- (2008) Steven Goodman SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY
- GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
- (2008) Gordon H Guyatt et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
Create your own webinar
Interested in hosting your own webinar? Check the schedule and propose your idea to the Peeref Content Team.
Create NowBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started