TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: The example of economic costs of biological invasions
Published 2021 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
TEMPORARY REMOVAL: Non-English languages enrich scientific knowledge: The example of economic costs of biological invasions
Authors
Keywords
Ecological bias, Management, Knowledge gaps, InvaCost, Native languages, Stakeholders
Journal
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT
Volume -, Issue -, Pages 144441
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Online
2021-03-11
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144441
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Ignoring non‐English‐language studies may bias ecological meta‐analyses
- (2020) Ko Konno et al. Ecology and Evolution
- InvaCost, a public database of the economic costs of biological invasions worldwide
- (2020) C. Diagne et al. Scientific Data
- Assessing the uneven global distribution of readership, submissions and publications in applied ecology: Obvious problems without obvious solutions
- (2019) Martin A. Nuñez et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- From conference abstract to publication in the conservation science literature
- (2019) Luis D. Verde Arregoitia et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Effects of publication bias on conservation planning
- (2019) R. Hickisch et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- Building a tool to overcome barriers in research-implementation spaces: The Conservation Evidence database
- (2019) William J. Sutherland et al. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION
- Don’t dismiss citations to journals not published in English
- (2018) Vladimir S. Lazarev et al. NATURE
- Publish translations of the best Chinese papers
- (2018) Juan Tao et al. NATURE
- The major barriers to evidence-informed conservation policy and possible solutions
- (2018) David C. Rose et al. Conservation Letters
- A methodological guide to using and reporting on interviews in conservation science research
- (2018) Juliette C. Young et al. Methods in Ecology and Evolution
- A prioritised list of invasive alien species to assist the effective implementation of EU legislation
- (2017) Carles Carboneras et al. JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Invasion Science in the Developing World: A Response to Ricciardi et al .
- (2017) Rafael D. Zenni et al. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION
- Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science
- (2017) Moreno Di Marco et al. Global Ecology and Conservation
- Publish (in English) or perish: The effect on citation rate of using languages other than English in scientific publications
- (2016) Mario S. Di Bitetti et al. AMBIO
- Languages Are Still a Major Barrier to Global Science
- (2016) Tatsuya Amano et al. PLOS BIOLOGY
- A spatial mismatch between invader impacts and research publications
- (2015) C. Bellard et al. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY
- The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
- (2015) Neal Robert Haddaway et al. PLoS One
- Four barriers to the global understanding of biodiversity conservation: wealth, language, geographical location and security
- (2013) T. Amano et al. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
- Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature
- (2012) Edward Lowry et al. Ecology and Evolution
- Practitioner’s perspectives: introducing a different voice in applied ecology
- (2011) Philip E. Hulme JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY
- Biological invasions in developing and developed countries: does one model fit all?
- (2009) Martin A. Nuñez et al. BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS
Publish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn MoreAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started