4.7 Article

Discovering High Potent Hsp90 Inhibitors as Antinasopharyngeal Carcinoma Agents through Fragment Assembling Approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 64, Issue 4, Pages 2010-2023

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c01521

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [8180131061, 81473138, 81573310, 81803361]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0203403]
  3. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou [201604020109]
  4. Guangdong Provincial Key Lab [2011A060901014]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M673089]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study introduces a new method for discovering potent Hsp90 inhibitors by assembling fragments, providing a novel approach for finding anti-nasopharyngeal carcinoma agents. Through chemotyping analysis and click chemistry, 15 anti-Hsp90 fragments were identified, 21 compounds were synthesized, and the more potent 4f inhibitor was discovered.
Hsp90 is a new promising target for cancer treatment. Many inhibitors have been discovered as therapeutic agents, and some have passed Phase I and II. However, no one is approved by FDA yet. Novel and druggable Hsp90 inhibitors are still demanding. Here, we report a new way to discover high potent Hsp90 inhibitors as antinasopharyngeal carcinoma agents through assembling fragments. With chemotyping analysis, we extract seven chemotypes from 3482 known Hsp90 inhibitors, screen 500 fragments that are compatible with the chemotypes, and confirm 15 anti-Hsp90 fragments. Click chemistry is employed to construct 172 molecules and synthesize 21 compounds among them. The best inhibitor 3d was further optimized and resulted in more potent 4f (IC50 = 0.16 mu M). In vitro and in vivo experiments confirmed that 4f is a promising agent against nasopharyngeal carcinoma. This study may provide a strategy in discovering new ligands against targets without well-understood structures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available